From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752786AbbG1PuI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:50:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:34919 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750883AbbG1PuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:50:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:50:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:50 -0700 From: Joshua Clayton To: Julia Lawall Cc: Larry Finger , Florian Schilhabel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sudip Mukherjee , Nitin Kuppelur , Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 RESEND 8/8] staging: rtl8712: change SupportedRates to rates Message-ID: <9594685.hpOiZGHKrk@jclayton-pc> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.6 (Linux/3.19.0-21-generic; KDE/4.14.6; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 05:37:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c > > index 83d4bca..1ded691 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c > > @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ static inline char *translate_scan(struct _adapter *padapter, > > /* Add the protocol name */ > > iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWNAME; > > if ((r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network. > > - SupportedRates)) == true) { > > + rates)) == true) { > > if (ht_cap == true) > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bn"); > > else > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11b"); > > } else if ((r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network. > > - SupportedRates)) == true) { > > + rates)) == true) { > > if (ht_cap == true) > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bgn"); > > else > > The placement of the line breaks here is partucularly unpleasant. Perhaps > that could be adjusted now that the field name is shorter. Theer may be > some other cases in the patch where the line breaks could be adjusted to > improve readability. > > julia I agree. Dan Carpenter earlier complained about me fixing up the lines while changing the variable name. Should that be a separate patch? -- ~Joshua Clayton