From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB52C43141 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4938221916 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:45:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4938221916 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933194AbeFURpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:10 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:35322 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932844AbeFURpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5LHYH7I048506 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jrfbf3fxm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:07 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:04 -0400 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w5LHj3Lk17367532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:45:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072F511206B; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FFE112063; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] tpm: Implement tpm_chip_find() and tpm_chip_put() for other subsystems To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180620204236.1572523-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180620204236.1572523-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180621171518.GI11859@linux.intel.com> From: Stefan Berger Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:03 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180621171518.GI11859@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-MW X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062117-0052-0000-0000-000003022D09 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009234; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000265; SDB=6.01050290; UDB=6.00538239; IPR=6.00829261; MB=3.00021788; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-21 17:45:06 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062117-0053-0000-0000-00005D17F706 Message-Id: <95b2970f-b71b-4cfc-c188-7ae7e8cb94c5@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-21_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=960 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806210190 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/21/2018 01:15 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:42:33PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> Implement tpm_chip_find() for other subsystems to find a TPM chip and >> get a reference to that chip. Once done with using the chip, the reference >> is released using tpm_chip_put(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > You should sort this out in a way that we don't end up with duplicate > functions. Do you want me to create a function *like* tpm_chip_find_get() that takes an additional parameter whether to get the ops semaphore and have that function called by the existing tpm_chip_find_get() and the new tpm_chip_find(). The latter would then not get the ops semphore. I didn't want to do this since one time the function returns with a lock held and the other time not.   Stefan > > /Jarkko >