mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:08:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95bc8e95-3e52-9e50-9fe6-7ba1d4e07ca4@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405094005.18545-1-amishin@t-argos.ru>



On 4/5/2024 3:10 PM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
> cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() and hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() can be called from
> different places with various parameters. So cpufreq_cpu_get() can return
> null as 'policy' in some circumstances.
> Fix this bug by adding null return check.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: a28b2bfc099c ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 64420d9cfd1e..5f7e04e8497b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0};
>   	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +	if (!policy)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

You should be doing this after all variable declaration, somewhere

...
...
struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;
u64 delivered_perf;
int ret;

if (!policy)
	return -ENODEV;

cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
..
..

>   	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
>   	u64 delivered_perf;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -822,6 +825,9 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = {
>   static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);

same here.

> +	if (!policy)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>   	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
>   	u64 desired_perf;
>   	int ret;

-Mukesh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-05 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05  9:40 Aleksandr Mishin
2024-04-05 10:38 ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2024-04-05 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-04-08  9:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Aleksandr Mishin
2024-04-19  6:39   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95bc8e95-3e52-9e50-9fe6-7ba1d4e07ca4@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=amishin@t-argos.ru \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®