From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@chromium.org>,
"Chiang, Mac" <mac.chiang@intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: bdw-rt5650: remove 3-channel capture support
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:59:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95d0a64e-d2e9-7117-75c5-6c68b1426f93@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR1101MB2132BBB45C6683D6BE1FBCD897D90@BN6PR1101MB2132.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2020-04-17 03:32, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>
>> It seems like a generic problem on all Broadwell devices so let's solve with
>> one a single patchset.
>>
>> Shouldn't we just add the 2ch constraints for broadwell.c and bdw-rt5677.c,
>> and the 2 or 4ch constraint for bdw-rt5650.c? Would this work for you?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Pierre
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Are you saying submitting a new patch to add constraints to all three broadwell.c,
> bdw-rt5650.c, and bdw-rt5677.c?
>
>
> Regards,
> Brent
>
What Pierre suggested is that you submit a series of patches instead -
one for each of BDW machine boards. If the same problem exists on all of
them, there is no reason to left other boards unattended.
Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-13 8:28 Brent Lu
2020-04-13 10:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-04-13 14:29 ` Lu, Brent
2020-04-14 18:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-04-17 1:32 ` Lu, Brent
2020-04-17 7:59 ` Cezary Rojewski [this message]
2020-04-17 13:33 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95d0a64e-d2e9-7117-75c5-6c68b1426f93@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=benzh@chromium.org \
--cc=brent.lu@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mac.chiang@intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®