mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "luwei (O)" <luwei32@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<asml.silence@gmail.com>, <imagedong@tencent.com>,
	<brouer@redhat.com>, <keescook@chromium.org>, <jbenc@redhat.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Add check for csum_start in skb_partial_csum_set()
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:50:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95d0f4dd-3350-be65-27a8-2b41aee9df3d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLOcvDRMi9kVr86xNp5=h4JWpx9yYWicVxCwSMgAJGf_g@mail.gmail.com>


在 2023/4/11 4:13 PM, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:33 AM luwei (O) <luwei32@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2023/4/11 1:30 AM, Willem de Bruijn 写道:
>>
>> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:22 AM Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> If an AF_PACKET socket is used to send packets through a L3 mode ipvlan
>> and a vnet header is set via setsockopt() with the option name of
>> PACKET_VNET_HDR, the value of offset will be nagetive in function
>> skb_checksum_help() and trigger the following warning:
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2023 at net/core/dev.c:3262
>> skb_checksum_help+0x2dc/0x390
>> ......
>> Call Trace:
>>   <TASK>
>>   ip_do_fragment+0x63d/0xd00
>>   ip_fragment.constprop.0+0xd2/0x150
>>   __ip_finish_output+0x154/0x1e0
>>   ip_finish_output+0x36/0x1b0
>>   ip_output+0x134/0x240
>>   ip_local_out+0xba/0xe0
>>   ipvlan_process_v4_outbound+0x26d/0x2b0
>>   ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3+0x44b/0x480
>>   ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xd6/0x1d0
>>   ipvlan_start_xmit+0x32/0xa0
>>   dev_hard_start_xmit+0xdf/0x3f0
>>   packet_snd+0xa7d/0x1130
>>   packet_sendmsg+0x7b/0xa0
>>   sock_sendmsg+0x14f/0x160
>>   __sys_sendto+0x209/0x2e0
>>   __x64_sys_sendto+0x7d/0x90
>>
>> The root cause is:
>> 1. skb->csum_start is set in packet_snd() according vnet_hdr:
>>     skb->csum_start = skb_headroom(skb) + (u32)start;
>>
>>     'start' is the offset from skb->data, and mac header has been
>>     set at this moment.
>>
>> 2. when this skb arrives ipvlan_process_outbound(), the mac header
>>     is unset and skb_pull is called to expand the skb headroom.
>>
>> 3. In function skb_checksum_help(), the variable offset is calculated
>>     as:
>>        offset = skb->csum_start - skb_headroom(skb);
>>
>>     since skb headroom is expanded in step2, offset is nagetive, and it
>>     is converted to an unsigned integer when compared with skb_headlen
>>     and trigger the warning.
>>
>> Not sure why it is negative ? This seems like the real problem...
>>
>> csum_start is relative to skb->head, regardless of pull operations.
>>
>> whatever set csum_start to a too small value should be tracked and fixed.
>>
>> Right. The only way I could see it go negative is if something does
>> the equivalent of pskb_expand_head with positive nhead, and without
>> calling skb_headers_offset_update.
>>
>> Perhaps the cause can be found by instrumenting all the above
>> functions in the trace to report skb_headroom and csum_start.
>> And also virtio_net_hdr_to_skb.
>> .
>>
>> Hi, Eric  and Willem,  sorry for not describing this issue clearly enough. Here is the detailed data path:
>>
>> 1.  Users call sendmsg() to send message with a AF_PACKET domain and SOCK_RAW type socket. Since vnet_hdr
>>
>> is set,  csum_start is calculated as:
>>
>>                        skb->csum_start = skb_headroom(skb) + (u32)start;     // see the following code.
>>
>> the varible "start" it passed from user data, in my case it is 5 and skb_headroom is 2, so skb->csum_start is 7.
>>
> I think you are rephrasing, but you did not address my feedback.
>
> Namely, "csum_start < skb->network_header" does not look sensical to me.
>
> csum_start should be related to the transport header, not network header.
>
> If you fix a bug, please fix it completely, instead of leaving room
> for future syzbot reports.
>
> Also, your reference to ipvlan pulling a mac header is irrelevant to
> this bug, and adds confusion.
>
> That is  because csum_start is relative to skb->head, not skb->data.
> So ipvlan business does not change csum_start or skb->head.

Hi, Eric, I have no doubt that skb->csum_start is relative to skb->head, 
not skb->data.

The problem is not skb->csum_start but variable "offset" in 
skb_checksum_help() which triggers the warning.

skb_checksum_help()
     ...
     offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);      // offset is nagetive 
here
     ret = -EINVAL;
     if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= skb_headlen(skb)))
         goto out;
     ...

"offset" here  means the offset from skb->data, it will change as 
skb->data changes and can be nagetive.

if "offset" is nagetive it will convert to a large unsigned int number 
and trigger the warning and the root

cause is csum_start is too small as I described previously.

Besides, the raw socket may not have a transport header so the transport 
header should not be used.

> .

-- 
Best Regards,
Lu Wei


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10  2:21 Lu Wei
2023-04-10 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-04-10 17:30   ` Willem de Bruijn
     [not found]     ` <450994d7-4a77-99df-6317-b535ea73e01d@huawei.com>
2023-04-11  8:13       ` Eric Dumazet
2023-04-11 13:50         ` luwei (O) [this message]
2023-04-11 14:03         ` luwei (O)
2023-04-12 13:44           ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-14  8:45             ` 答复: " luwei (O)
2023-04-14 16:48               ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-14 17:20                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-15  2:18                   ` luwei (O)
2023-04-15 13:47                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-18  1:59                       ` luwei (O)
2023-04-18 12:44                         ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95d0f4dd-3350-be65-27a8-2b41aee9df3d@huawei.com \
    --to=luwei32@huawei.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®