From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
To: Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
it+raid@molgen.mpg.de
Subject: Re: md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle" transition
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 03:06:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95fbd558-5e46-7a6a-43ac-bcc5ae8581db@cloud.ionos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa9567fd-38e1-7b9c-b3e1-dc2fdc055da5@molgen.mpg.de>
On 11/28/20 13:25, Donald Buczek wrote:
> Dear Linux mdraid people,
>
> we are using raid6 on several servers. Occasionally we had failures,
> where a mdX_raid6 process seems to go into a busy loop and all I/O to
> the md device blocks. We've seen this on various kernel versions.
>
> The last time this happened (in this case with Linux 5.10.0-rc4), I took
> some data.
>
> The triggering event seems to be the md_check cron job trying to pause
> the ongoing check operation in the morning with
>
> echo idle > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/sync_action
>
> This doesn't complete. Here's /proc/stack of this process:
>
> root@done:~/linux_problems/mdX_raid6_looping/2020-11-27# ps -fp 23333
> UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
> root 23333 23331 0 02:00 ? 00:00:00 /bin/bash
> /usr/bin/mdcheck --continue --duration 06:00
> root@done:~/linux_problems/mdX_raid6_looping/2020-11-27# cat
> /proc/23333/stack
> [<0>] kthread_stop+0x6e/0x150
> [<0>] md_unregister_thread+0x3e/0x70
> [<0>] md_reap_sync_thread+0x1f/0x1e0
> [<0>] action_store+0x141/0x2b0
> [<0>] md_attr_store+0x71/0xb0
> [<0>] kernfs_fop_write+0x113/0x1a0
> [<0>] vfs_write+0xbc/0x250
> [<0>] ksys_write+0xa1/0xe0
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> Note, that md0 has been paused successfully just before.
What is the personality of md0? Is it also raid6?
>
> 2020-11-27T02:00:01+01:00 done CROND[23333]: (root) CMD
> (/usr/bin/mdcheck --continue --duration "06:00")
> 2020-11-27T02:00:01+01:00 done root: mdcheck continue checking
> /dev/md0 from 10623180920
> 2020-11-27T02:00:01.382994+01:00 done kernel: [378596.606381] md:
> data-check of RAID array md0
> 2020-11-27T02:00:01+01:00 done root: mdcheck continue checking
> /dev/md1 from 11582849320
> 2020-11-27T02:00:01.437999+01:00 done kernel: [378596.661559] md:
> data-check of RAID array md1
> 2020-11-27T06:00:01.842003+01:00 done kernel: [392996.625147] md:
> md0: data-check interrupted.
> 2020-11-27T06:00:02+01:00 done root: pause checking /dev/md0 at
> 13351127680
> 2020-11-27T06:00:02.338989+01:00 done kernel: [392997.122520] md:
> md1: data-check interrupted.
> [ nothing related following.... ]
>
> After that, we see md1_raid6 in a busy loop:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> COMMAND
> 2376 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.0 1387:38
> md1_raid6
Seems the reap sync thread was trying to stop md1_raid6 while md1_raid6
was triggered again and again.
>
> Also, all processes doing I/O do the md device block.
>
> This is /proc/mdstat:
>
> Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> [multipath]
> md1 : active raid6 sdk[0] sdj[15] sdi[14] sdh[13] sdg[12] sdf[11]
> sde[10] sdd[9] sdc[8] sdr[7] sdq[6] sdp[5] sdo[4] sdn[3] sdm[2] sdl[1]
> 109394518016 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm
> 2 [16/16] [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU]
> [==================>..] check = 94.0%
> (7350290348/7813894144) finish=57189.3min speed=135K/sec
> bitmap: 0/59 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
> md0 : active raid6 sds[0] sdah[15] sdag[16] sdaf[13] sdae[12]
> sdad[11] sdac[10] sdab[9] sdaa[8] sdz[7] sdy[6] sdx[17] sdw[4] sdv[3]
> sdu[2] sdt[1]
> 109394518016 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm
> 2 [16/16] [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU]
> bitmap: 0/59 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
So the RECOVERY_CHECK flag should be set, not sure if the simple changes
helps, but you may give it a try.
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 98bac4f..e2697d0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9300,7 +9300,8 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
md_update_sb(mddev, 0);
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery) &&
- !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) {
+ (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery) ||
+ test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery))) {
/* resync/recovery still happening */
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
goto unlock;
Thanks,
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-28 12:25 Donald Buczek
2020-11-30 2:06 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2020-12-01 9:29 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-02 17:28 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-03 1:55 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-12-03 11:42 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-21 12:33 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-19 11:30 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-20 16:33 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-23 13:04 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25 8:54 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25 21:32 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 0:44 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 9:50 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 11:14 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 12:58 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 14:06 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 16:05 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-02 15:42 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 11:38 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-08 14:53 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 18:41 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-09 0:46 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-09 9:24 ` Donald Buczek
2023-03-14 13:25 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-14 13:55 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-03-14 14:45 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-16 15:25 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-29 0:01 ` Song Liu
2023-08-22 21:16 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-23 1:22 ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-23 15:33 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-24 1:18 ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-28 20:32 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-30 1:36 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05 3:50 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05 13:54 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-13 9:08 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-13 14:16 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-14 6:03 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-17 8:55 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25 1:11 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-25 9:11 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25 9:32 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 3:02 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 9:30 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-03-15 9:53 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 7:52 ` Donald Buczek
2024-05-30 8:12 Yaohui Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95fbd558-5e46-7a6a-43ac-bcc5ae8581db@cloud.ionos.com \
--to=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=buczek@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=it+raid@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®