From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
To: "Yeoreum Yun" <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
"sami.mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: efi: add a separate timeout for UpdateCapsule()
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:47:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <960e985e-b338-4648-a29b-1f8a31e00599@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903113238.2291844-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Hello Yeoreum Yun,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026, at 13:32, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> On platforms that allows to update firmware in runtime, UpdateCapsule()
> may immediately write a firmware image to persistent storage.
> This operation can take longer than EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT.
>
> Use a separate timeout for the UpdateCapsule() runtime service. By
> default, wait indefinitely to avoid interrupting an ongoing firmware
> update. Administrators may configure an appropriate timeout, in seconds,
> through /sys/firmware/efi/capsule_update_timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c | 14 +++------
> include/linux/efi.h | 10 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Given that UpdateCapsule() is rarely used these days at runtime, I
wonder if we should just call it synchronously instead of via the
EFI workqueue.
I assume that would also solve the timeout issue?
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 0327a39d31fa..aef0ba170e3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,18 @@ static unsigned long __initdata mem_reserve =
> EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
> static unsigned long __initdata rt_prop = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
> static unsigned long __initdata initrd = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
>
> +/*
> + * Depending on the platform, UpdateCapsule() may update the firmware
> + * immediately if the platform allows to update the firmware while in
> runtime.
> + * In this case, writing the image to firmware storage may take longer
> than
> + * EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT (120 seconds).
> + *
> + * To handle this, use a separate timeout for the UpdateCapsule()
> runtime
> + * service. Wait indefinitely by default, and allow administrators to
> set
> + * an appropriate timeout in seconds through
> /sys/firmware/efi/capsule_update_timeout.
> + */
> +unsigned long efi_capsule_update_timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> +
> extern unsigned long primary_display_table;
>
> struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
> @@ -163,15 +175,44 @@ static ssize_t fw_platform_size_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT) ? 64 : 32);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t capsule_update_timeout_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%lu\n", efi_capsule_update_timeout / HZ);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t capsule_update_timeout_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long secs, timeout;
> +
> + ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &secs);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + if (check_mul_overflow(secs, HZ, &timeout))
> + timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> + if (timeout < EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT)
> + timeout = EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT;
> +
> + efi_capsule_update_timeout = timeout;
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> extern __weak struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_fw_vendor;
> extern __weak struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_runtime;
> extern __weak struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_config_table;
> static struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_fw_platform_size =
> __ATTR_RO(fw_platform_size);
> +static struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_capsule_update_timeout =
> + __ATTR_RW_MODE(capsule_update_timeout, 0600);
>
> static struct attribute *efi_subsys_attrs[] = {
> &efi_attr_systab.attr,
> &efi_attr_fw_platform_size.attr,
> + &efi_attr_capsule_update_timeout.attr,
> &efi_attr_fw_vendor.attr,
> &efi_attr_runtime.attr,
> &efi_attr_config_table.attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> index 2344b9d1e81f..b0f867f828c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> @@ -118,14 +118,6 @@ union efi_rts_args {
>
> struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work;
>
> -/*
> - * Upper bound on how long we wait for a single EFI runtime service
> - * call to finish before declaring firmware wedged. Chosen to be longer
> - * than any plausible legitimate call (including UpdateCapsule on slow
> - * SPI-NOR) while still bounding userspace wait time.
> - */
> -#define EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT (120 * HZ)
> -
> /*
> * efi_queue_work: Queue EFI runtime service call and wait for completion
> * @_rts: EFI runtime service function identifier
> @@ -347,6 +339,8 @@ static void __nocfi efi_call_rts(struct work_struct *work)
> static efi_status_t __efi_queue_work(enum efi_rts_ids id,
> union efi_rts_args *args)
> {
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) {
> pr_warn_once("EFI Runtime Services are disabled!\n");
> return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> @@ -369,8 +363,8 @@ static efi_status_t __efi_queue_work(enum efi_rts_ids id,
> goto exit;
> }
>
> - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&efi_rts_work.efi_rts_comp,
> - EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT)) {
> + timeout = (id == EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE) ? efi_capsule_update_timeout :
> EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT;
> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&efi_rts_work.efi_rts_comp,
> timeout)) {
> pr_err("EFI runtime service %d wedged in firmware; disabling EFI
> runtime services\n",
> id);
> clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags);
> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> index aa15ff88539b..8e14ca5e57de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -1345,4 +1345,14 @@ extern struct blocking_notifier_head
> efivar_ops_nh;
> void efivars_generic_ops_register(void);
> void efivars_generic_ops_unregister(void);
>
> +/*
> + * Upper bound on how long we wait for a single EFI runtime service
> + * call to finish before declaring firmware wedged. Chosen to be longer
> + * than any plausible legitimate call (excluding UpdateCapsule() while
> + * still bounding userspace wait time.
> + */
> +#define EFI_RTS_TIMEOUT (120 * HZ)
> +
> +extern unsigned long efi_capsule_update_timeout;
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_EFI_H */
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 11:32 Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-03 11:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2026-09-03 14:10 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-03 14:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-03 14:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-03 14:35 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=960e985e-b338-4648-a29b-1f8a31e00599@app.fastmail.com \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®