Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fix devm_add_action_or_reset() parameter

[Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>]

On 03/05/2019 2:19 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
>
>> The second parameter of devm_add_action_or_reset() shall be a function,
>> not a function address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
>> index 9e33165..8748d4d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
>> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int rmi_setup_irq_domain(struct hid_device *hdev)
>>   	if (!hdata->domain)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> -	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, &rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
>> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
> Why do you think this is wrong C?


Because I was not aware that both func and &func refer to the same 
function pointer.

Now I know :)


>