From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jroedel@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/type1: Adopt fast IOTLB flush interface when unmap IOVAs
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:54:40 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <966d7407-d91f-f652-454d-bbda263567ba@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180108140718.5ce48492@t450s.home>
Hi Alex,
On 1/9/18 4:07 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> @@ -661,6 +705,8 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>>> if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&unmapped_regions);
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * We use the IOMMU to track the physical addresses, otherwise we'd
>>> * need a much more complicated tracking system. Unfortunately that
>>> @@ -698,24 +744,36 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - unmapped = iommu_unmap(domain->domain, iova, len);
>>> - if (WARN_ON(!unmapped))
>>> + entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!entry)
>>> break;
>
> Turns out this nagged at me a bit too, this function only gets called
> once to dump the vfio_dma, so bailing out here leaves pages pinned and
> IOMMU mappings in place, for a performance optimization that we could
> just skip. We could sync&unpin anything collected up to this point and
> continue this step with a synchronous unmap/unpin. Thanks,
Ah, that's an over look in my part also. Thanks for catching this. I'll implement
the fallback mechanism per your suggestion in v3.
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-27 9:20 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Reduce IOTLB flush when pass-through dGPU devices Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-12-27 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/type1: Adopt fast IOTLB flush interface when unmap IOVAs Suravee Suthikulpanit
2018-01-08 20:53 ` Alex Williamson
2018-01-08 21:07 ` Alex Williamson
2018-01-17 16:54 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2018-01-18 3:25 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2018-01-18 17:34 ` Alex Williamson
2017-12-27 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/amd: Add support for fast IOTLB flushing Suravee Suthikulpanit
2018-01-22 3:41 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2018-01-24 11:43 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=966d7407-d91f-f652-454d-bbda263567ba@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®