From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4FFC64E75 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA9A21741 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390834AbgKZOpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:45:17 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35256 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389316AbgKZOpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:45:17 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A6E31B; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.29.239] (unknown [10.57.29.239]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E76B3F71F; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:45:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, amitk@kernel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com References: <20201124161025.27694-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: <9680cd44-c22e-2f5e-43ec-4a7f16680a45@arm.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:45:13 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/26/20 2:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > [ ... ] > >>>> changed via sysfs. >>>> >>>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree. >>> >>> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack. >>> >>> >> >> Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs? >> Maybe I should drop mine then. > > Ok let me clarify :) > > In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the > consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented > before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I > apply the changes or not. > > I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she > commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also > Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong. > > As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are > no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon. > > Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber > of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;) > Thank you clarifying this and taking the patches into the testing branch. Regards, Lukasz