From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751282AbdAQQOS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:14:18 -0500 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:33899 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751250AbdAQQOP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:14:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip To: Linus Walleij References: <1484110841-2391-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> CC: Tero Kristo , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Grygorii Strashko From: Keerthy Message-ID: <9681e3d1-b769-286c-82e7-6cff85707c9e@ti.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:44:08 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 January 2017 08:22 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Keerthy wrote: > >> The Davinci GPIO driver is implemented to work with one monolithic >> Davinci GPIO platform device which may have up to Y(144) gpios. > > I'm a bit confused by the different DaVinci series since there seem > to be different series floating and I don't know what order to apply them, > it fails for me. > > Can you: > > - Rebase *ALL* your DaVinci work on top of the "devel" branch in the > GPIO tree. > > - Repost *ALL* patches that should be applied, in one batch. > > - Include any accumulated ACKs etc. :-) I have already posted a consolidated v2: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg19109.html Then seems like patch 6/6 is not required. So i will be posting the final set with Grygorii's reviewed-by. You can directly pick the v3 set. Thanks, Keerthy > > Yours, > Linus Walleij >