mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, helgaas@kernel.org,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 3/4] vfio/pci: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 12:26:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96c749ba-1b42-425f-8767-a3fce4a4d30b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604135717.5dc69583@shazbot.org>


On 6/4/2026 12:57 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 10:17:04 -0700
> Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/4/2026 1:28 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:24:14AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
>>>> +static void vfio_pci_core_aer_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!vdev->pci_saved_state)
>>>> +		return;
>>>> +
>>>> +	pci_load_saved_state(pdev, vdev->pci_saved_state);
>>>> +	pci_restore_state(pdev);
>>>> +}
>>> Shouldn't there be a cooresponding user space notification that the
>>> device has been restored? There's an eventfd on the error detected side
>>> so user space can know the device needs recovery, but how does it come
>>> to know that the reset is completed?
>> I think if the VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl completes successfully it should
>> be an indication that the reset has completed? AFAIU the ioctl will
>> drive a reset via pci_try_reset_function(). If reset completes completes
>> successfully the reset_done() callback is called via pci_dev_restore().
>> So I don't think we need an eventfd to notify on reset completion.
>> Otherwise we would have the same problem today, where userspace is
>> unaware that VFIO_DEVICE_RESET did indeed successfully reset the device,
>> no? Or am I missing something?
> I'm starting to feel a little sketchy about this.  I asked claude to
> enumerate the state restores and the source of that restored state.
> Hopefully this ascii table survives:
>
>    ┌──────────────────────────┬────────────────────────┬─────────────────────┐
>    │           Step           │         Source         │ Snapshot-dependent? │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │                          │ EXP cap save buffer    │                     │
>    │ pci_restore_pcie_state   │ (pci_find_saved_cap,   │ YES                 │
>    │                          │ cap.data)              │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │                          │ live                   │                     │
>    │ pci_restore_pasid_state  │ pdev->pasid_enabled +  │ no                  │
>    │                          │ pasid_features         │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_pri_state    │ live pdev->pri_enabled │ no                  │
>    │                          │  + pri_reqs_alloc      │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_ats_state    │ live dev->ats_enabled  │ no                  │
>    │                          │ + ats_stu              │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_vc_state     │ VC ext-cap save buffer │ YES                 │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │                          │ live resource_size()   │                     │
>    │ pci_restore_rebar_state  │ (re-derived, written   │ no                  │
>    │                          │ to hw)                 │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_dpc_state    │ DPC ext-cap save       │ YES                 │
>    │                          │ buffer                 │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_ptm_state    │ PTM ext-cap save       │ YES                 │
>    │                          │ buffer                 │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │                          │ TPH ext-cap save       │                     │
>    │ pci_restore_tph_state    │ buffer, gated on live  │ YES (gated)         │
>    │                          │ tph_enabled            │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_aer_clear_status     │ clears hw status (not  │ n/a                 │
>    │                          │ a restore)             │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_aer_state    │ ERR ext-cap save       │ YES                 │
>    │                          │ buffer                 │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │                          │ saved_config_space[16] │                     │
>    │ pci_restore_config_space │  — type-0 header       │ YES                 │
>    │                          │ (COMMAND, BARs,        │                     │
>    │                          │ cacheline…)            │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_pcix_state   │ PCI-X cap save buffer  │ YES                 │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_msi_state    │ live msi_desc list +   │ no                  │
>    │                          │ msi(x)_enabled         │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_enable_acs           │ re-derived from ACS    │ no                  │
>    │                          │ policy                 │                     │
>    ├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
>    │ pci_restore_iov_state    │ live dev->sriov        │ no                  │
>    │                          │ (num_VFs, ctrl)        │                     │
>    └──────────────────────────┴────────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
>
> For things like MSI/X, SR-IOV, RE-BAR, etc. we're actually restoring
> from the kernel internal state rather than the save buffer state, so
> this is a no-op.  However, one thing in that list stands out, TPH.
>
> We don't yet support enabling TPH, but there are series on the list
> that propose to add this.  The TPH buffer space in the saved state is
> allocated just by the capability being present.  On open TPH is
> disabled and the saved state is untouched, zeros.  If TPH is then
> enabled and the device reset, the pre-reset save state populates the
> TPH save buffer and we restore that state post-reset.  With the change
> here, reset_done would then push the open saved state.  The live TPH
> state is enabled, therefore the restore pushes the original open state,
> zeros.
>
> This would result in a visible user change and maybe more importantly
> shows that we're relying on ad-hoc behavior, without really any specific
> policy to have this work reliably.  It actually seems like only in the
> close function, where we've disabled anything the user might have
> enabled, is it really valid to restore the original state.  Thanks,
>
> Alex

I was trying to see if we can remove the callback and still restore the 
device. The original reason why we wanted the callback, was to restore 
the device state into something sane[1]. Since commit a2f1e22390ac 
("PCI/ERR: Ensure error recoverability at all times"), which removed the 
saved_state check from pci_restore_state(), we will always restore from 
the last saved state. However, the last saved state in vfio can have the 
Command register Memory bit disabled (for example could be done through 
vfio_pci_pre_reset() in QEMU). This becomes problematic when we try to 
restore MSI-X from in kernel data and when MSI-X is enabled. AFAICT the 
msix restore path doesn't check if the Memory bit is enabled before 
writing the MSI-X message, which could cause an Unsupported Request 
error from the device. From my experiments, enabling Memory bit before 
restoring MSI-X state was sufficient to get the device in a sane state 
without this patch.

So we could remove this patch. But maybe there is a gap in MSI-X 
restoration path?

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250814145743.204ca19a.alex.williamson@redhat.com/

Thanks

Farhan



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-03 18:24 [PATCH v18 0/4] [VFIO] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2026-06-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v18 1/4] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2026-06-03 22:20   ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-03 23:35     ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-04 18:27       ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v18 2/4] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2026-06-03 22:37   ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-03 23:40     ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v18 3/4] vfio/pci: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2026-06-03 22:46   ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-04  0:01     ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-04  8:28   ` Keith Busch
2026-06-04 17:17     ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-04 19:57       ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-08 19:26         ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2026-06-09 19:16           ` Alex Williamson
2026-06-09 20:13             ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-04 20:42       ` Keith Busch
2026-06-05 18:41         ` Farhan Ali
2026-06-09 21:38           ` Keith Busch
2026-06-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v18 4/4] vfio/pci: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96c749ba-1b42-425f-8767-a3fce4a4d30b@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome