From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <babu.moger@amd.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<eranian@google.com>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<irogers@google.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <namhyung@google.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Fix arch_mbm_* array overrun on SNC
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:48:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96f40371-1b6d-4398-a384-78333e75847b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822190212.1848788-1-peternewman@google.com>
Thank you very much Peter.
Boris, could you please consider this for inclusion?
Thank you
Reinette
On 8/22/24 12:02 PM, Peter Newman wrote:
> When using resctrl on systems with Sub-NUMA Clustering enabled,
> monitoring groups may be allocated RMID values which would overrun the
> arch_mbm_{local,total} arrays.
>
> This is due to inconsistencies in whether the SNC-adjusted num_rmid
> value or the unadjusted value in resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() is
> used. The num_rmid value for the L3 resource is currently:
>
> resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache
>
> As a simple fix, make resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() return the
> SNC-adjusted, L3 num_rmid value on x86.
>
> Fixes: e13db55b5a0d ("x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Squashed blank lines added to linux/resctrl.h
> - Reviewed-by Reinette
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240722204611.3549213-1-peternewman@google.com/
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h | 6 ------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> index 12dbd2588ca7..8b1b6ce1e51b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> @@ -156,12 +156,6 @@ static inline void resctrl_sched_in(struct task_struct *tsk)
> __resctrl_sched_in(tsk);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void)
> -{
> - /* RMID are independent numbers for x86. num_rmid_idx == num_rmid */
> - return boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid + 1;
> -}
> -
> static inline void resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_decode(u32 idx, u32 *closid, u32 *rmid)
> {
> *rmid = idx;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 1930fce9dfe9..8591d53c144b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
> +
> + /* RMID are independent numbers for x86. num_rmid_idx == num_rmid */
> + return r->num_rmid;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * cache_alloc_hsw_probe() - Have to probe for Intel haswell server CPUs
> * as they do not have CPUID enumeration support for Cache allocation.
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index b0875b99e811..d94abba1c716 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct resctrl_schema {
>
> /* The number of closid supported by this resource regardless of CDP */
> u32 resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(struct rdt_resource *r);
> +u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void);
> int resctrl_arch_update_domains(struct rdt_resource *r, u32 closid);
>
> /*
>
> base-commit: 47ac09b91befbb6a235ab620c32af719f8208399
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 19:02 Peter Newman
2024-08-22 21:48 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-08-28 9:32 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Newman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96f40371-1b6d-4398-a384-78333e75847b@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@google.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®