From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: "Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] drm/i915 Screen corruption introduced by a00b10c360b35d6431a94cb
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:39:55 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96f4040e154c151ce996b4afdaf42d5f.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a955ec5ebee88511413424fdcaf85c4.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>
On Tue, February 22, 2011 04:25, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
>> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need both
>> patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there are really
>> no corruptions with just the 2nd patch.
>
> I managed to create some corruption with an xterm above xpdf. It looks different
> than the original corruption, so I think it's safe to say it's a different bug:
>
> http://img593.imageshack.us/i/ss1298340823.png
> http://img203.imageshack.us/i/ss1298340776.png
>
> This was without xcompmgr running, I don't think I would have seen it otherwise.
> Actually, it turns out it's really easy to trigger as well, so I can more easily
> test patches now. Unfortunately I wasn't smart enough to store the bisecting kernels,
> gah!
>
> I tried with both your patches, as well as the HIC poking patch, but I still get it.
>
> I'll try to pinpoint more exactly when this started to happen.
Okay, I tried older kernels and I get it even with 2.6.34, so I think it's a bug
in userspace, like intel-dri, or perhaps the intel X driver (though I get the same
with an older version).
Greetings,
Indan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-22 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 3:25 Indan Zupancic
2011-02-22 3:39 ` Indan Zupancic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-19 5:58 Indan Zupancic
2011-02-19 18:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-02-20 2:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 2:26 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 9:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-02-20 11:02 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 10:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-02-20 11:19 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 13:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-02-21 1:11 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-21 2:51 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 3:51 ` Peter Stuge
2011-02-20 6:13 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-21 4:10 ` Peter Stuge
2011-02-21 5:26 ` Indan Zupancic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96f4040e154c151ce996b4afdaf42d5f.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl \
--to=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome