From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] coccinelle: platform_get_irq: Fix parse error
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <970643a9-5f19-29ee-dde6-5b81c9038a04@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909060857290.2975@hadrien>
>> I proposed something also during the development for this SmPL script.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/24/274
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/c98b8f50-1adf-ea95-a91c-ec451e9fefe2@web.de/
>
> Markus,
>
> This is not the first time you have suggested to someone to do something
> that was simply incorrect.
We come along different application expectations.
> Please actually test your suggestions before proposing them.
I dare to express also “questionable” development ideas.
>> Should disjunctions eventually work in the semantic patch language also together with
>> comparison operators?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/40
>
> No.
Can a similar effect be achieved by using a SmPL constraint for
a metavariable of the type “binary operator”?
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/b4509f6e7fb06d5616bb19dd5a110b203fd0e566/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L266
>> Will any additional software adjustments be taken into account?
>
> No.
I imagine that this view can change over time according to remaining feature requests.
Regards,
Markus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 3:30 YueHaibing
2019-09-06 5:09 ` Julia Lawall
2019-09-06 5:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-06 6:52 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-06 6:59 ` Julia Lawall
2019-09-06 7:40 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=970643a9-5f19-29ee-dde6-5b81c9038a04@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=efremov@linux.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®