From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Fix XGene-1 TVAL register math error
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:11:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <973694d5-9a97-2239-be69-8f380d6e7130@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121145343.896018-1-maz@kernel.org>
On 21/11/2022 15:53, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From: Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com>
>
> The TVAL register is 32 bit signed. Thus only the lower 31 bits are
> available to specify when an interrupt is to occur at some time in the
> near future. Attempting to specify a larger interval with TVAL results
> in a negative time delta which means the timer fires immediately upon
> being programmed, rather than firing at that expected future time.
>
> The solution is for Linux to declare that TVAL is a 31 bit register rather
> than give its true size of 32 bits. This prevents Linux from programming
> TVAL with a too-large value. Note that, prior to 5.16, this little trick
> was the standard way to handle TVAL in Linux, so there is nothing new
> happening here on that front.
>
> The softlockup detector hides the issue, because it keeps generating
> short timer deadlines that are within the scope of the broken timer.
>
> Disable it, and you start using NO_HZ with much longer timer deadlines,
> which turns into an interrupt flood:
>
> 11: 1124855130 949168462 758009394 76417474 104782230 30210281
> 310890 1734323687 GICv2 29 Level arch_timer
>
> And "much longer" isn't that long: it takes less than 43s to underflow
> TVAL at 50MHz (the frequency of the counter on XGene-1).
>
> Some comments on the v1 version of this patch by Marc Zyngier:
>
> XGene implements CVAL (a 64bit comparator) in terms of TVAL (a countdown
> register) instead of the other way around. TVAL being a 32bit register,
> the width of the counter should equally be 32. However, TVAL is a
> *signed* value, and keeps counting down in the negative range once the
> timer fires.
>
> It means that any TVAL value with bit 31 set will fire immediately,
> as it cannot be distinguished from an already expired timer. Reducing
> the timer range back to a paltry 31 bits papers over the issue.
>
> Another problem cannot be fixed though, which is that the timer interrupt
> *must* be handled within the negative countdown period, or the interrupt
> will be lost (TVAL will rollover to a positive value, indicative of a
> new timer deadline).
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
> Fixes: 012f18850452 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Work around broken CVAL implementations")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> [maz: revamped the commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221024165422.GA51107@zipoli.concurrent-rt.com
> ---
Applied
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 14:53 Marc Zyngier
2022-11-22 8:11 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=973694d5-9a97-2239-be69-8f380d6e7130@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®