mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>, jjohnson@kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath12k: fix NULL pointer dereference in rhash table destroy
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:08:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <973da9e9-3851-4e00-85d4-28140c039127@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604071032.659009-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>

On 6/4/2026 12:10 AM, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> When unbinding the ath12k driver, kernel NULL pointer dereferences
> occur in irq_work_sync() called from rhashtable_destroy().
> 
> Two hash tables are affected:
> 1. ath12k_link_sta hash table in ath12k_base
> 2. ath12k_dp_link_peer hash table in ath12k_dp
> 
> The issue happens because the destroy functions are called unconditionally
> in cleanup paths, but the hash tables are only initialized late in their
> respective init functions. If the device was never fully started or if the
> init functions failed before initializing the hash tables, the pointers
> will be NULL. The issues are always reproducible from a VM because the MSI
> addressing initialization is failing.

My preference would be to fix the logic so that the deinit is symmetric with
init, and if any stage of init fails, it should unwind whatever init occurred
up to that point. So this patch seems to be a bandage instead of an engineered
fix.

But I'll let the Qualcomm engineering team give their opinion.

> 
> Call trace for ath12k_link_sta_rhash_tbl_destroy:
>  RIP: irq_work_sync+0x1e/0x70
>  rhashtable_destroy+0x12/0x60
>  ath12k_link_sta_rhash_tbl_destroy+0x19/0x40 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_core_stop+0xe/0x80 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_core_hw_group_cleanup+0x6b/0xb0 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_pci_remove+0x60/0x110 [ath12k]
> 
> Call trace for ath12k_dp_link_peer_rhash_tbl_destroy:
>  RIP: irq_work_sync+0x1e/0x70
>  rhashtable_destroy+0x12/0x60
>  ath12k_dp_link_peer_rhash_tbl_destroy+0x29/0x50 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_dp_cmn_device_deinit+0x21/0x140 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_core_hw_group_cleanup+0x6b/0xb0 [ath12k]
>  ath12k_pci_remove+0x60/0x110 [ath12k]
> 
> Fix this by adding NULL checks before calling rhashtable_destroy() in
> both destroy functions.
> 
> Fixes: 57ccca410237 ("wifi: ath12k: Add hash table for ath12k_link_sta in ath12k_base")
> Fixes: a88cf5f71adf ("wifi: ath12k: Add hash table for ath12k_dp_link_peer")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_peer.c | 5 +++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/peer.c    | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_peer.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_peer.c
> index a1100782d45e..38045564e223 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_peer.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_peer.c
> @@ -275,9 +275,14 @@ int ath12k_dp_link_peer_rhash_tbl_init(struct ath12k_dp *dp)
>  void ath12k_dp_link_peer_rhash_tbl_destroy(struct ath12k_dp *dp)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&dp->link_peer_rhash_tbl_lock);
> +	if (!dp->rhead_peer_addr)
> +		goto unlock;

not a fan of this pattern.
if we go with a bandaid solution then i'd want to use guard(mutex) so that
there isn't a need for a cleanup goto -- we could just return like the patch below

> +
>  	rhashtable_destroy(dp->rhead_peer_addr);
>  	kfree(dp->rhead_peer_addr);
>  	dp->rhead_peer_addr = NULL;
> +
> +unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dp->link_peer_rhash_tbl_lock);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/peer.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/peer.c
> index 2e875176baaa..80fee2ce68f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/peer.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/peer.c
> @@ -444,6 +444,9 @@ int ath12k_link_sta_rhash_tbl_init(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>  
>  void ath12k_link_sta_rhash_tbl_destroy(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>  {
> +	if (!ab->rhead_sta_addr)
> +		return;
> +
>  	rhashtable_destroy(ab->rhead_sta_addr);
>  	kfree(ab->rhead_sta_addr);
>  	ab->rhead_sta_addr = NULL;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04  7:10 Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-06-08 17:08 ` Jeff Johnson [this message]
2026-06-09  6:40   ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=973da9e9-3851-4e00-85d4-28140c039127@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®