Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] coresight-tpdm: Initialize DSB subunit configuration

[Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>]

Hi Suzuki,

On 3/23/2023 10:23 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 23/03/2023 06:04, Tao Zhang wrote:
>> DSB is used for monitoring “events”. Events are something that
>> occurs at some point in time. It could be a state decode, the
>> act of writing/reading a particular address, a FIFO being empty,
>> etc. This decoding of the event desired is done outside TPDM.
>> DSB subunit need to be configured in enablement and disablement.
>> A struct that specifics associated to dsb dataset is needed. It
>> saves the configuration and parameters of the dsb datasets. This
>> change is to add this struct and initialize the configuration of
>> DSB subunit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 58 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 17 ++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> index f4854af..5e1e2ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> @@ -20,17 +20,59 @@
>>     DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(tpdm_devs, "tpdm");
>>   +static int tpdm_init_datasets(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>
>
>> +{
>> +    if (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB) {
>> +        if (!drvdata->dsb) {
>> +            drvdata->dsb = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev,
>> +                            sizeof(*drvdata->dsb), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +            if (!drvdata->dsb)
>> +                return -ENOMEM;
>
> Please do not club init/allocation of datasets to "resetting" the
> datasets. Why don't we move the allocation to tpmd_datasets_setup() ?
> And this function could simply be called :
>
> tpdm_reset_datasets()
>
> and can be called from the tpdm_datasets_setup() too.
>
I will update this in the next patch series.
>
>> +        } else
>> +            memset(drvdata->dsb, 0, sizeof(struct dsb_dataset));
>> +
>> +        drvdata->dsb->trig_ts = true;
>> +        drvdata->dsb->trig_type = false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_trigger_type(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata, u32 *val)
>> +{
>> +    if (drvdata->dsb->trig_type)
>> +        *val |= TPDM_DSB_CR_TRIG_TYPE;
>> +    else
>> +        *val &= ~TPDM_DSB_CR_TRIG_TYPE;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Do we really need a function for this ? How is it different from 
> trig_ts ?

"trig_type" is for setting trigger type, and "trig_ts" is for setting 
trigger

timestamp. These two variables are configured in two different registers.

Do you mean we don't need to wrap it as a function here?

>
>>   static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>>       u32 val;
>>   -    /* Set the enable bit of DSB control register to 1 */
>> +    val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
>> +    /* Set trigger timestamp */
>> +    if (drvdata->dsb->trig_ts)
>> +        val |= TPDM_DSB_TIER_XTRIG_TSENAB;
>> +    else
>> +        val &= ~TPDM_DSB_TIER_XTRIG_TSENAB;
>> +    writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
>> +
>>       val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>> +    /* Set trigger type */
>> +    set_trigger_type(drvdata, &val);
>> +    /* Set the enable bit of DSB control register to 1 */
>>       val |= TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA;
>>       writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>>   }
>>     /* TPDM enable operations */
>> +/* The TPDM or Monitor serves as data collection component for various
>> + * dataset types. It covers Basic Counts(BC), Tenure Counts(TC),
>> + * Continuous Multi-Bit(CMB), Multi-lane CMB(MCMB) and Discrete Single
>> + * Bit(DSB). This function will initialize the configuration according
>> + * to the dataset type supported by the TPDM.
>> + */
>>   static void __tpdm_enable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>>       CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> @@ -110,15 +152,13 @@ static const struct coresight_ops tpdm_cs_ops = {
>>       .source_ops    = &tpdm_source_ops,
>>   };
>>   -static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +static void tpdm_datasets_setup(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>>       u32 pidr;
>>   -    CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>
> Why is this removed ?
We only need to read the register here, don't need to unlock the 
registers here, right?
>
>>       /*  Get the datasets present on the TPDM. */
>>       pidr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + CORESIGHT_PERIPHIDR0);
>>       drvdata->datasets |= pidr & GENMASK(TPDM_DATASETS - 1, 0);
>> -    CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>>   }
>>     /*
>> @@ -181,6 +221,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, 
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>>       struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
>>       struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata;
>>       struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 };
>> +    int ret;
>>         pdata = coresight_get_platform_data(dev);
>>       if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>> @@ -200,6 +241,8 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, 
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>>         drvdata->base = base;
>>   +    tpdm_datasets_setup(drvdata);
>> +
>>       /* Set up coresight component description */
>>       desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&tpdm_devs, dev);
>>       if (!desc.name)
>> @@ -216,7 +259,12 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, 
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>>           return PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
>>         spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock);
>> -    tpdm_init_default_data(drvdata);
>> +    ret = tpdm_init_datasets(drvdata);
>
> Couldn't this be done before the coresight_register() ? As such
> I don't see any dependency on having a csdev ?

I will update this in the next patch series.


Tao

>
> Suzuki