mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:31:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <97ba2918-dbc8-82bf-c017-9837b731f0f1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479315396-2131-1-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>

On 11/16/2016 08:56 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Robert O'Callahan reported that after an execve PTRACE_GETREGSET
> NT_X86_XSTATE continues to return the pre-exec register values
> until the exec'ed task modifies FPU state.  The test code is at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1164286.
> 
> What is happening is when eagerfpu is enabled, fpu__clear() did
> not properly clear fpstate.  Fix it by doing just that.

Functionally, I think the patch is fine.  just a few
comment/documentation nits.

I think fpu__clear()'s comments are a bit out of date.  Could we make it
clear that it is invalidating both fpregs *and* fpstate?

I also think the

	/* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */"

comment was fairly valuable.  Could we find some way to keep it?

The new comment:

> +	/*
> +	 * When eagerfpu is used, make sure fpstate is cleared and initialized.
> +	 */

also kinda implies that the if() block is only messing with fpstate.
Could we make that more clear?  Maybe by commenting the individual lines
inside the if():

> +	if (use_eager_fpu()) {
> +		fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
> +		user_fpu_begin();

instead of having it above?  Maybe something like:

	if (use_eager_fpu()) {
		/* activate and load init fpstate into 'fpu' */
		fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
		/* re-activate fpregs: */
		user_fpu_begin();
		/* take new init fpstate and place in fpregs: */
 		copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
 	}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-17 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 16:56 Yu-cheng Yu
2016-11-16 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 21:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-11-17 22:18   ` Yu-cheng Yu
2016-11-21  9:40   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=97ba2918-dbc8-82bf-c017-9837b731f0f1@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome