From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:31:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97ba2918-dbc8-82bf-c017-9837b731f0f1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479315396-2131-1-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
On 11/16/2016 08:56 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Robert O'Callahan reported that after an execve PTRACE_GETREGSET
> NT_X86_XSTATE continues to return the pre-exec register values
> until the exec'ed task modifies FPU state. The test code is at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1164286.
>
> What is happening is when eagerfpu is enabled, fpu__clear() did
> not properly clear fpstate. Fix it by doing just that.
Functionally, I think the patch is fine. just a few
comment/documentation nits.
I think fpu__clear()'s comments are a bit out of date. Could we make it
clear that it is invalidating both fpregs *and* fpstate?
I also think the
/* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */"
comment was fairly valuable. Could we find some way to keep it?
The new comment:
> + /*
> + * When eagerfpu is used, make sure fpstate is cleared and initialized.
> + */
also kinda implies that the if() block is only messing with fpstate.
Could we make that more clear? Maybe by commenting the individual lines
inside the if():
> + if (use_eager_fpu()) {
> + fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
> + user_fpu_begin();
instead of having it above? Maybe something like:
if (use_eager_fpu()) {
/* activate and load init fpstate into 'fpu' */
fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
/* re-activate fpregs: */
user_fpu_begin();
/* take new init fpstate and place in fpregs: */
copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 16:56 Yu-cheng Yu
2016-11-16 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 21:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-11-17 22:18 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2016-11-21 9:40 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97ba2918-dbc8-82bf-c017-9837b731f0f1@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome