From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
<christian.loehle@arm.com>, <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
<zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>, <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
<lenb@kernel.org>, <ray.huang@amd.com>,
<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <treding@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
<ksitaraman@nvidia.com>, <sanjayc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>,
<bbasu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:34:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97c3140b-071f-4c4a-b42b-d84b6107017d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916103820.1760297-1-sumitg@nvidia.com>
Hello Sumit,
On 9/16/2026 4:08 PM, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> This series keeps the CPPC cpufreq policy alive across CPU hotplug and
> preserves the OSPM-set CPPC registers (Energy Performance Preference,
> Autonomous Activity Window, Autonomous Selection - set via sysfs).
>
> Without online()/offline() callbacks, the core tears a policy down when
> its last CPU goes offline and rebuilds it on the way back, re-reading the
> CPPC capabilities each time. The values written to these registers can
> be lost:
>
> - Across CPU hotplug or suspend/resume: the platform may reset them
> while the CPU is offline.
> - On driver unload: the driver-written value is left in the register
> instead of returning to its pre-driver state.
>
> Handle these with:
>
> - Patch 1: adds online()/offline() callbacks so the core keeps policy
> alive across CPU hotplug instead of tearing it down and rebuilding it.
> - Patch 2: makes the autonomous selection register helpers take a u64.
> - Patch 3: adds a table-driven mechanism that captures each register's
> firmware value at init(), restores it from offline(), and reapplies
> the OSPM-set value from online().
> - Patch 4: extends the same save/restore to system suspend/resume.
>
> v4[4] -> v5:
> - Patch 1:
> - offline() stops the frequency invariance updates and online()
> restarts them, replacing the resync that raced with tick. (Sashiko)
> - reorder the functions to match cppc_cpufreq_driver. (Jie Zhan)
> - Patch 3:
> - reapply the OSPM-set registers even when the performance control
> write fails. (Sashiko)
> - Patch 4:
> - suspend() stops the frequency invariance updates too, completing the
> patch 1 change for a policy whose CPUs stay online.
>
> Sumit Gupta (4):
> cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the policy across CPU hotplug
> ACPI: CPPC: Make autonomous selection helpers take a u64
> cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload
> cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across suspend/resume
>
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 20 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 8 +-
> 4 files changed, 381 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
I was able to hack the Kconfig to build cppc_cpufreq.c for x86 too
and test this out on a Zen3 machine that uses shared memory based
CPPC control.
FWIW, I could verify that "auto_select" and
"energy_performance_preference_val" persists correctly across an
offline-online cycle on my system so feel free to include:
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 10:38 Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the policy across CPU hotplug Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ACPI: CPPC: Make autonomous selection helpers take a u64 Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 18:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across suspend/resume Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 19:04 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-09-17 7:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97c3140b-071f-4c4a-b42b-d84b6107017d@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®