From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher@cherry.de>,
Vahe Grigoryan <vahe.grigoryan@theobroma-systems.com>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rockchip: increase gmac rx_delay on rk3399-puma
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:24:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97d7b661-8b9b-4c56-aa85-3833718f4e01@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241205151827.282130-1-jakob.unterwurzacher@cherry.de>
On 05/12/2024 16:18, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
> During mass manufacturing, we noticed the mmc_rx_crc_error counter,
> as reported by "ethtool -S eth0 | grep mmc_rx_crc_error", to increase
> above zero during nuttcp speedtests. Most of the time, this did not
> affect the achieved speed, but it prompted this investigation.
>
> Cycling through the rx_delay range on six boards (see table below) of
> various ages shows that there is a large good region from 0x12 to 0x35
> where we see zero crc errors on all tested boards.
>
> The old rx_delay value (0x10) seems to have always been on the edge for
> the KSZ9031RNX that is usually placed on Puma.
>
> Choose "rx_delay = 0x23" to put us smack in the middle of the good
> region. This works fine as well with the KSZ9131RNX PHY that was used
> for a small number of boards during the COVID chip shortages.
>
> Board S/N PHY rx_delay good region
> --------- --- --------------------
> Puma TT0069903 KSZ9031RNX 0x11 0x35
> Puma TT0157733 KSZ9031RNX 0x11 0x35
> Puma TT0681551 KSZ9031RNX 0x12 0x37
> Puma TT0681156 KSZ9031RNX 0x10 0x38
> Puma 17496030079 KSZ9031RNX 0x10 0x37 (Puma v1.2 from 2017)
> Puma TT0681720 KSZ9131RNX 0x02 0x39 (alternative PHY used in very few boards)
>
> Intersection of good regions = 0x12 0x35
> Middle of good region = 0x23
>
> Relates-to: PUMA-111
Drop 3rd party tags.
Also you you CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on
mainline kernel or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman.
Regardless of the reason, process needs improvement: please rebase and
always work on mainline or start using mentioned tools tools, so correct
addresses will be used.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-05 15:18 Jakob Unterwurzacher
2024-12-05 15:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-12-09 11:30 ` Quentin Schulz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97d7b661-8b9b-4c56-aa85-3833718f4e01@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=jakob.unterwurzacher@cherry.de \
--cc=jakobunt@gmail.com \
--cc=klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vahe.grigoryan@theobroma-systems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®