From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756242AbeDXGF2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 02:05:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:42195 "EHLO mail-lf0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755919AbeDXGFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 02:05:22 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqIunLfgwkzuPUdF/TaeH5csfUeW63kCQcZ2nfb/fsk5S8/v1GRw9G8yujC0juV41GYEiUvWw== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time configuration To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Juergen Gross , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lyan@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, andrii_chepurnyi@epam.com, Oleksandr Andrushchenko References: <20180419133934.31306-1-andr2000@gmail.com> <998533bb-8042-b07e-cb79-661750e035d9@gmail.com> <7b4c1f8a-6317-1f17-5950-64a1b7183dba@gmail.com> <20180423185530.GC66646@dtor-ws> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko Message-ID: <97f3a94f-f1d3-a162-c081-15f938eb7dd6@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:05:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180423185530.GC66646@dtor-ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/23/2018 09:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:29:45AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> On 04/23/2018 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 23/04/18 10:02, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>>> Juergen, Jason, Dmitry >>>> any comment on this? >>> Oleksandr, please give us some time. I can't speak for others, but I am >>> not sitting here idling and hoping that some work (e.g. patches to >>> review) might appear. >>> >>> I have a lot of other stuff to do and will respond when I find some time >>> to look at your patches. >>> >>> Pinging others on Monday when having sent out the patch only on Thursday >>> is rather unfriendly. >> Really sorry about this, my bad. >> I had an impression that the only change we need to >> discuss was uint -> bool change which seemed rather trivial > I am sorry I did not respond to the previous version until today, but I > do not think that we should be extending module parameters for this. > Protocol features are already there for absolute pointers and > multi-touch, keyboard and relative pointers should use the same > mechanism. Ok, then I'll start from extending the protocol > Thanks. >