mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: phylink: always config mac for (delayed) phy
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:56:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98234080-946e-4b36-832f-113b185e7bca@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z31CJS1YUvPGiEXs@shell.armlinux.org.uk>



On 1/7/25 4:03 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:14:03PM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/7/25 1:47 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> Going through the log...
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>>> Log before this patch is applied:
>>>> [root@bpir3 ~]# dmesg | grep eth1
>>>> [    2.515179] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: mediatek frame engine at 0xffff800082380000, irq 123
>>>> [   38.271431] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: configuring for inband/2500base-x link mode
>>>> [   38.279828] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: major config, requested inband/2500base-x
>>>> [   38.288009] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: interface 2500base-x inband modes: pcs=01 phy=00
>>>> [   38.296800] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: major config, active inband/inband,an-disabled/2500base-x
>>>
>>> This is indeed without the PHY. We're using inband, although the PCS
>>> mode is PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_INBAND_DISABLED, meaning inband won't be
>>> used. As there is no PHY, we can't switch to MLO_AN_PHY.
>>>
>>>> [   38.306362] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/2500base-x/none adv=00,00000000,00008000,0000e240 pause=04
>>>> [   39.220149] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 2 (mii) rate match none supports 0-3,6-7,13-14
>>>> [   39.229758] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 3 (gmii) rate match none supports 0-3,5-7,13-14
>>>> [   39.239420] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 4 (sgmii) rate match none supports 0-3,5-7,13-14
>>>> [   39.249173] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 22 (1000base-x) rate match none supports 5-7,13-14
>>>> [   39.259080] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 23 (2500base-x) rate match none supports 6-7,13-14,47
>>>> [   39.594676] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: PHY i2c:sfp-1:11 uses interfaces 4,23, validating 4,23
>>>
>>> The PHY comes along...
>>>
>>>> [   39.603992] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 4 (sgmii) rate match none supports 0-3,5-7,13-14
>>>> [   39.650080] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1:  interface 23 (2500base-x) rate match none supports 6-7,13-14,47
>>>> [   39.660266] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: PHY [i2c:sfp-1:11] driver [RTL8221B-VB-CG 2.5Gbps PHY (C45)] (irq=POLL)
>>>> [   39.671037] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: phy: 2500base-x setting supported 00,00000000,00008000,000060ef advertising 00,00000000,00008000,000060ef
>>>> [   39.684761] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: requesting link mode inband/2500base-x with support 00,00000000,00008000,000060ef
>>>
>>> We decide to use MLO_AN_INBAND and 2500base-X, which we're already using.
>>>
>>>> [   40.380076] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: phy link down 2500base-x/Unknown/Unknown/none/off
>>>> [   40.397090] brlan: port 5(eth1) entered blocking state
>>>> [   40.402223] brlan: port 5(eth1) entered disabled state
>>>> [   40.407437] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: entered allmulticast mode
>>>> [   40.414400] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: entered promiscuous mode
>>>> [   44.500077] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: phy link up 2500base-x/2.5Gbps/Full/none/off
>>>> [   44.508528] mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth1: No phy led trigger registered for speed(2500)
>>>
>>> ... but we don't see link-up reported by the PCS after the PHY comes
>>> up. Why is that - I think that needs investigation before we proceed
>>> to patch the issue, because that suggests the PCS isn't seeing
>>> valid 2500base-X from the PHY.
>>>
>>
>> I think it is because pl->act_link_an_mode stays at MLO_AN_INBAND, but
>> it needs to be set to MLO_AN_PHY, so that only the phy determines the
>> link state:
>>
>> phylink_resolve() {
>>     ...
>> 	} else if (pl->act_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_PHY) {
>> 		link_state = pl->phy_state;
>>     ...
>> }
> 
> Please see my reply to Daniel. The PCS should still be capable of
> reporting whether its link is up or down irrespective of whether
> in-band status is being used or not.
> 
> While it is correct that PHY mode needs to be used here, your report
> has pointed out that the driver is not reporting the PCS link state
> correctly when in-band is disabled.
> 
> Given that the current state of affairs has revealed this other bug,
> I would like that addressed first while there is a trivial test case
> here.
> 

So I've narrowed down the problem a bit:

At first state->link is set to true, while looking at the bmsr.

But because linkmode_test_bit(fd_bit, state->advertising) and
linkmode_test_bit(fd_bit, state->lp_advertising) are both false,
state->link is set to false after looking at the bmsr.

void phylink_mii_c22_pcs_decode_state(struct phylink_link_state *state,
				      u16 bmsr, u16 lpa)
{
	state->link = !!(bmsr & BMSR_LSTATUS);
	...
	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
		phylink_decode_c37_word(state, lpa, SPEED_2500);
	...
}

static void phylink_decode_c37_word(struct phylink_link_state *state,
				    uint16_t config_reg, int speed)
{
	...
	if (linkmode_test_bit(fd_bit, state->advertising) &&
	    linkmode_test_bit(fd_bit, state->lp_advertising)) {
		state->speed = speed;
		state->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
	} else {
		/* negotiation failure */
		state->link = false;
	}
	...
}

And I can confirm, if I change the part above into the part below
(removing the if statement), the PCS also reports the link is up and the
connection is functional end-to-end. Not that I'm saying this change is
the solution, only for narrowing down the problem.

static void phylink_decode_c37_word(struct phylink_link_state *state,
				    uint16_t config_reg, int speed)
{
	...
	state->speed = speed;
	state->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
	...
}

Also worth mentioning, up until v12 of the pcs-mtk-lynxy.c
mtk_pcs_lynxi_get_state() did not call
phylink_mii_c22_pcs_decode_state() at all for 2500base-x.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 12:36 Eric Woudstra
2025-01-07 12:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-07 13:14   ` Eric Woudstra
2025-01-07 13:20     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-07 14:23       ` Eric Woudstra
2025-01-07 15:03     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-09  8:56       ` Eric Woudstra [this message]
2025-01-09  9:15         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-06-02  7:19           ` Ilya K
2025-06-02  8:48             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-06-02 13:00               ` Ilya K
2025-06-02 15:25                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-06-03 18:17                   ` Ilya K
2025-01-07 13:16   ` Daniel Golle
2025-01-07 13:26     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-07 14:59     ` Russell King (Oracle)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98234080-946e-4b36-832f-113b185e7bca@gmail.com \
    --to=ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome