From: Harikrishna shenoy <h-shenoy@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<andrzej.hajda@intel.com>, <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
<aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>, <devarsht@ti.com>,
<dianders@chromium.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<javierm@redhat.com>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
<jonas@kwiboo.se>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
<lumag@kernel.org>, <lyude@redhat.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <mordan@ispras.ru>,
<mripard@kernel.org>, <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
<rfoss@kernel.org>, <s-jain1@ti.com>, <simona@ffwll.ch>,
<tzimmermann@suse.de>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 0/6] MHDP8546 fixes related to DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR usecase
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:27:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <982fa530-35ec-44e8-b95a-fe040efc5db5@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22985633-f20c-4f36-96d1-ce01fe6cf6df@ideasonboard.com>
On 21/11/25 17:37, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/11/2025 14:14, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>> With the DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR framework, the connector is
>> no longer initialized in bridge_attach() when the display controller
>> sets the DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag.
>> This causes a null pointer dereference in cdns_mhdp_modeset_retry_fn()
>> when trying to access &conn->dev->mode_config.mutex.
>> Observed on a board where EDID read failed.
>> (log: https://gist.github.com/Jayesh2000/233f87f9becdf1e66f1da6fd53f77429)
>>
>> Patch 1 adds a connector_ptr which takes care of both
>> DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR and !DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR
>> case by setting the pointer in appropriate hooks and checking for pointer
>> validity before accessing the connector.
>> Patch 2 adds mode validation hook to bridge fucntions.
>> Patch 3 fixes HDCP to work with both DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR
>> and !DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR case by moving HDCP state handling
>> into the bridge atomic check inline with the
>> DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR model.
>> Patches 4,5 do necessary cleanup and alignment for using
>> connector pointer.
>>
>> The rationale behind the sequence of commits is we can cleanly
>> switch to drm_connector pointer after removal of connector helper
>> code blocks, which are anyways not touch after
>> DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR has been enabled in driver.
>>
>> The last patch make smaller adjustment: lowering the log level for
>> noisy DPCD transfer errors.
>>
>> v8 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251014094527.3916421-1-h-shenoy@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v8-v9:
>> -Move the patch 6 in v8 related to HDCP to patch 3 and add fixes tag.
>> -Update to connector_ptr in HDCP code in patch 1.
>> -Rebased on next-20251114.
>
> Don't base on linux-next, except in some quite special circumstances.
> Base on latest major version from Linus, or -rc from Linus, or
> drm-misc-next. Usually drm-misc-next is a safe choice for DRM patches.
>
> And if you make changes to a series, it's not a "resend" but a new version.
>
> Tomi
>
Hi Tomi,
Thanks for pointing it out, will re-spin next version v10 and base it on
drm-misc-next.
Regards.
>>
>> v7 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250929083936.1575685-1-h-shenoy@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v7-v8:
>> -Move patches with firxes tag to top of series with appropriate changes
>> to them.
>> -Add R/B tag to patch
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ae3snoap64r252sbqhsshsadxfmlqdfn6b4o5fgfcmxppglkqf@2lsstfsghzwb/
>>
>> v6 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250909090824.1655537-1-h-shenoy@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v6-v7:
>> -Update cover letter to explain the series.
>> -Add R/B tag in PATCH 1 and drop fixes tag as suggested.
>> -Drop fixes tag in PATCH 2.
>> -Update the commit messages for clear understanding of changes done in patches.
>>
>> v5 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811075904.1613519-1-h-shenoy@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v5 -> v6:
>> -Update cover letter to clarify the series in better way.
>> -Add Reviewed-by tag to relevant patches.
>>
>> v4 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250624054448.192801-1-j-choudhary@ti.com>
>>
>> Changelog v4->v5:
>> - Handle HDCP state in bridge atomic check instead of connector
>> atomic check
>>
>> v3 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529142517.188786-1-j-choudhary@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v3->v4:
>> - Fix kernel test robot build warning:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/202505300201.2s6r12yc-lkp@intel.com/>
>>
>> v2 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250521073237.366463-1-j-choudhary@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v2->v3:
>> - Add mode_valid in drm_bridge_funcs to a separate patch
>> - Remove "if (mhdp->connector.dev)" conditions that were missed in v2
>> - Split out the move of drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder()
>> to a separate patch
>> - Drop "R-by" considering the changes in v2[1/3]
>> - Add Fixes tag to first 4 patches:
>> commit c932ced6b585 ("drm/tidss: Update encoder/bridge chain connect model")
>> This added DBANC flag in tidss while attaching bridge to the encoder
>> - Drop RFC prefix
>>
>> v1 patch link:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250116111636.157641-1-j-choudhary@ti.com/>
>>
>> Changelog v1->v2:
>> - Remove !DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR entirely
>> - Add mode_valid in drm_bridge_funcs[0]
>> - Fix NULL POINTER differently since we cannot access atomic_state
>> - Reduce log level in cdns_mhdp_transfer call
>>
>> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530091757.433106-1-j-choudhary@ti.com/
>>
>> Harikrishna Shenoy (1):
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Handle HDCP state in bridge
>> atomic check
>>
>> Jayesh Choudhary (5):
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Set the mhdp connector
>> earlier in atomic_enable()
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Add mode_valid hook to
>> drm_bridge_funcs
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Remove legacy support for
>> connector initialisation in bridge
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546*: Change drm_connector from
>> structure to pointer
>> drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Reduce log level for DPCD
>> read/write
>>
>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 258 +++++-------------
>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.h | 2 +-
>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-hdcp.c | 8 +-
>> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 12:14 Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 1/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Set the mhdp connector earlier in atomic_enable() Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 12:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-24 11:34 ` Harikrishna shenoy
2025-11-21 13:12 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-24 11:44 ` Harikrishna shenoy
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 2/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Add mode_valid hook to drm_bridge_funcs Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 12:43 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-24 9:30 ` Harikrishna shenoy
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 3/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Handle HDCP state in bridge atomic check Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 12:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-24 11:46 ` Harikrishna shenoy
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 4/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Remove legacy support for connector initialisation in bridge Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 13:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 5/6] cadence: cdns-mhdp8546*: Change drm_connector from structure to pointer Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 12:02 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-21 12:11 ` Harikrishna shenoy
2025-11-20 12:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 6/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Reduce log level for DPCD read/write Harikrishna Shenoy
2025-11-21 12:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v9 0/6] MHDP8546 fixes related to DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR usecase Tomi Valkeinen
2025-11-24 9:57 ` Harikrishna shenoy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=982fa530-35ec-44e8-b95a-fe040efc5db5@ti.com \
--to=h-shenoy@ti.com \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mordan@ispras.ru \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=s-jain1@ti.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®