mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched/fair|isolation: Correctly clear nohz.[nr_cpus|idle_cpus_mask] for isolated CPUs
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 23:01:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98443f19-c653-493e-a2a9-e1d07b9d8468@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403150543.2793354-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com>

On 4/3/24 11:05, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Zhang Rui reported that find_new_ilb() was iterating over CPUs in
> isolated cgroup partitions. This triggered spurious wakeups for
> theses CPUs. [1]
> The initial approach was to ignore CPUs on NULL sched domains, as
> isolated CPUs have a NULL sched domain. However a CPU:
> - with its tick disabled, so taken into account in
>    nohz.[idle_cpus_mask|nr_cpus]
> - which is placed in an isolated cgroup partition
> will never update nohz.[idle_cpus_mask|nr_cpus] again.
>
> To avoid that, the following variables should be cleared
> when a CPU is placed in an isolated cgroup partition:
> - nohz.idle_cpus_mask
> - nohz.nr_cpus
> - rq->nohz_tick_stopped
> This would allow to avoid considering wrong nohz.* values during
> idle load balance.
>
> As suggested in [2] and to avoid calling nohz_balance_[enter|exit]_idle()
> from a remote CPU and create concurrency issues, leverage the existing
> housekeeping HK_TYPE_SCHED mask to reflect isolated CPUs (i.e. on NULL
> sched domains).
> Indeed the HK_TYPE_SCHED mask is currently never set by the
> isolcpus/nohz_full kernel parameters, so it defaults to cpu_online_mask.
> Plus it's current usage fits CPUs that are isolated and should
> not take part in load balancing.
>
> Making use of HK_TYPE_SCHED for this purpose implies creating a
> housekeeping mask which can be modified at runtime.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230804090858.7605-1-rui.zhang@intel.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKfTPtAMd_KNKhXXGk5MEibzzQUX3BFkWgxtEW2o8FFTX99DKw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Pierre Gondois (7):
>    sched/isolation: Introduce housekeeping_runtime isolation
>    sched/isolation: Move HK_TYPE_SCHED to housekeeping runtime
>    sched/isolation: Use HKR_TYPE_SCHED in find_new_ilb()
>    sched/fair: Move/add on_null_domain()/housekeeping_cpu() checks
>    sched/topology: Remove CPUs with NULL sd from HKR_TYPE_SCHED mask
>    sched/fair: Remove on_null_domain() and redundant checks
>    sched/fair: Clear idle_cpus_mask for CPUs with NULL sd
>
>   include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>   include/linux/sched/nohz.h      |  2 ++
>   kernel/sched/fair.c             | 44 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>   kernel/sched/isolation.c        | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   kernel/sched/topology.c         |  7 +++++
>   5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
I had also posted a patch series on excluding isolated CPUs in isolated 
partitions from housekeeping cpumasks earlier this year. See

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229021414.508972-1-longman@redhat.com/

It took a different approach from this series. It looks like I should 
include HK_TYPE_MISC as well.

Cheers,
Longman


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 15:05 Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/isolation: Introduce housekeeping_runtime isolation Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/isolation: Move HK_TYPE_SCHED to housekeeping runtime Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/isolation: Use HKR_TYPE_SCHED in find_new_ilb() Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/fair: Move/add on_null_domain()/housekeeping_cpu() checks Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/topology: Remove CPUs with NULL sd from HKR_TYPE_SCHED mask Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/fair: Remove on_null_domain() and redundant checks Pierre Gondois
2024-04-04  7:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05  9:48     ` Pierre Gondois
2024-04-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/fair: Clear idle_cpus_mask for CPUs with NULL sd Pierre Gondois
2024-04-04  3:01 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-04-04 12:55   ` [PATCH 0/7] sched/fair|isolation: Correctly clear nohz.[nr_cpus|idle_cpus_mask] for isolated CPUs Pierre Gondois
2024-04-05  0:23     ` Waiman Long
2024-04-09 13:33       ` Pierre Gondois

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98443f19-c653-493e-a2a9-e1d07b9d8468@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®