From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932069AbWHaJ7A (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:59:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751417AbWHaJ7A (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:59:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54725 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbWHaJ67 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:58:59 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > - Send fine-grained incremental patches. It's OK to do complete > replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to > be stabilised. I thought the code was still officially *new*. As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet. He has further delegated review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so. So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree. If this isn't so, please clarify the situation. David