From: Willy Tarreau <wtarreau@free.fr>
To: ramorris@dilithium.net, "Robert A. Morris" <ramorris@dilithium.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bugs@linux-ide.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.19 + ide 2.2.19 03252001 patch problem
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 07:50:41 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <986536241.3acd59318b222@imp.free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TradeClient.0.9.0.Linux-2.2.18.0104052013545D.1150@ryoko.unguez.net>
In-Reply-To: <TradeClient.0.9.0.Linux-2.2.18.0104052013545D.1150@ryoko.unguez.net>
Quoting "Robert A. Morris" <ramorris@dilithium.net>:
[snip]
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 {
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 {
> DriveStatusError }
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: Write Cache FAILED Flushing!
[snip]
> This did NOT happen with 2.2.18 and the corresponding
> ide.2.2.18.1209.patch. It does NOT seem to happen on
> /dev/hda or /dev/hdc, which is lucky, since /dev/hdb
> is unused. I'm using lilo.conf to specify idebus=33.
[snip]
> The controller is a VIA 82C686A (Asus K7V mainboard).
> hda: WDC WD307AA, 29333MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=3739/255/63, UDMA(66)
> hdb: WDC AC28400R, 8063MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63, (U)DMA
> hdc: WDC WD307AA-00BAA0, 29333MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=59598/16/63,
> UDMA(66)
same problem observed here on same motherboard. The hard disk is a WDC AC23200L
configured as hda. I have tested several ide/kernel combinations and all I can
say is that 2.2.18 and 2.2.19 behave the same, but it worked till
ide.2.2.18.1221 included, and the bug appeared since ide.2.2.18.02122001.
I tried with and without vojtech's via patches (3.2, 4.2 and 4.3), but this
didn't change anything (to be honest, some combinations were obviously not made
to live together, and I had so many problems fitting all patches in one kernel
that it sometimes even didn't boot).
I can also say that this problem didn't show up on other chipsets (ali and
intel) with the same kernel+ide patch.
finally, I made my kernel with ide.2.2.18.1221 and all seems to be OK (one week
now). The diffs between the 2 versions were too important and I have not
investigated further into this, but I'm ready to make some tests if needed.
Regards,
Willy
PS: BTW Andre, could you please name your patches ide-2.2.19-YYYYMMDD so that a
directory listing show the chronological order ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-06 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-06 3:13 Robert A. Morris
2001-04-06 5:50 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2001-04-06 6:00 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-04-06 11:46 Robert A. Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=986536241.3acd59318b222@imp.free.fr \
--to=wtarreau@free.fr \
--cc=bugs@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ramorris@dilithium.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®