From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751434AbWFBSVm (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:21:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751435AbWFBSVm (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:21:42 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com ([66.249.82.205]:31216 "EHLO wx-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751434AbWFBSVl (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:21:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mEqnhWgk7WrQ3nEy4t+0Nw1CnUmVeaTDJEU/NuPk9y2zJtXlp1wkn0xnSbdFsuJJVwNfj63683p4eNM064IO3V8RxwaoXrOQbACvWT10kVApdy1Wx7tENnflBNGCHbDB+0Bk8L00QlNNNtDFdluwQtSWGC2R1tWMbPItAcnu+2M= Message-ID: <986ed62e0606021121t5ba8fd9bo2ce516267b269850@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:21:40 -0700 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: "Alan Cox" Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm2 Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" , "Arjan van de Ven" In-Reply-To: <1149263463.11429.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060601014806.e86b3cc0.akpm@osdl.org> <986ed62e0606011758w348080ebn6e8430ec9e5b2ed3@mail.gmail.com> <20060601183836.d318950e.akpm@osdl.org> <986ed62e0606020614j363bd71bn7d1fba23b78571f3@mail.gmail.com> <1149263463.11429.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 79ca3f7d35465f5b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/06, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2006-06-02 at 06:14 -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: [snip] > > Just one problem with that... > > > > config ATALK > > tristate "Appletalk protocol support" > > select LLC > > Strange. ATALK doesn't need 802.2LLC, merely SNAP. There's CONFIG_LLC, and there's also CONFIG_LLC2. I wonder if actual 802.2LLC support is the latter, not the former... -- -Barry K. Nathan