From: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, "Hans Reiser" <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3: bad unlock ordering (reiser4?)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 00:58:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <986ed62e0606050058v21b457a7tb4da4da62cb7e4e3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605065444.GA27445@elte.hu>
On 6/4/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> reporting the first one only is necessary, because the validator cannot
> trust a system's dependency info that it sees as incorrect. Deadlock
> possibilities are quite rare in a kernel that is "in balance". Right now
> we are not "in balance" yet, because the validator has only been added a
> couple of days ago. The flurry of initial fixes will die down quickly.
So, does that mean the plan is to annotate/tweak things in order to
shut up *each and every* false positive in the kernel?
Anyway, I tried your patch and I got this:
[ 401.004071] ( smbd-920 |#0): new 324990707 us user-latency.
[ 401.004264] stopped custom tracer.
[ 401.004412]
[ 401.004425] ======================================
[ 401.004687] [ BUG: bad unlock ordering detected! ]
[ 401.004849] --------------------------------------
[ 401.005010] smbd/920 is trying to release lock (&txnh->hlock) at:
[ 401.005302] [<e09a8332>] get_current_atom_locked_nocheck+0x3d/0x46 [reiser4]
[ 401.005702] but the next lock to release is:
[ 401.005856] (&atom->alock){--..}, at: [<e09a78da>]
txnh_get_atom+0x23/0x85 [reiser4]
[ 401.006391]
[ 401.006405] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 401.006660] 2 locks held by smbd/920:
[ 401.006804] #0: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0299d58>]
mutex_lock+0xd/0xf
[ 401.007373] #1: (&txnh->hlock){--..}, at: [<e09a78cc>]
txnh_get_atom+0x15/0x85 [reiser4]
[ 401.008021]
[ 401.008034] stack backtrace:
[ 401.010115] [<c01032ab>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x64/0x125
[ 401.010538] [<c01038bd>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[ 401.010955] [<c0103914>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[ 401.011367] [<c012f4b9>] lockdep_release+0x192/0x35e
[ 401.013039] [<c029b6dc>] _spin_unlock+0x19/0x27
[ 401.014899] [<e09a8332>] get_current_atom_locked_nocheck+0x3d/0x46 [reiser4]
[ 401.015674] [<e09b3c83>] oid_count_allocated+0xd/0x2c [reiser4]
[ 401.016649] [<e09bb853>] write_sd_by_inode_common+0x1fd/0x502 [reiser4]
[ 401.017788] [<e09bbb85>] create_object_common+0x2d/0x37 [reiser4]
[ 401.018926] [<e09b8f47>] create_vfs_object+0x376/0x551 [reiser4]
[ 401.020011] [<e09b91ab>] create_common+0x44/0x4b [reiser4]
[ 401.021047] [<c0167a6e>] vfs_create+0x67/0xad
[ 401.024271] [<c016a832>] open_namei+0x19b/0x6cd
[ 401.027492] [<c0158d64>] do_filp_open+0x2b/0x42
[ 401.030193] [<c0158ddc>] do_sys_open+0x61/0xef
[ 401.032721] [<c0158e9d>] sys_open+0x18/0x1a
[ 401.035432] [<c029b8cc>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
dmesg and /proc/latency_trace are here:
http://members.cox.net/barrykn/linux/trace/dmesg.reiser4-3
http://members.cox.net/barrykn/linux/trace/latency_trace_reiser4-3.bz2
--
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-05 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-04 12:04 Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-04 14:00 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-04 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-04 20:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-06-04 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-04 22:03 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-05 2:46 ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-05 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 11:22 ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-06-05 12:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 23:56 ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-05 7:58 ` Barry K. Nathan [this message]
2006-06-05 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 9:00 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-09 21:39 ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-09 21:36 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=986ed62e0606050058v21b457a7tb4da4da62cb7e4e3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=barryn@pobox.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome