Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: vchiq: use interruptible waits

[Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1521 bytes --]

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 20:12 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> Am 06.05.19 um 16:40 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> > Hi,
> > ...
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Nicolas
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/2881
> > [2] https://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=13485
> > [3] 
> > 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GBXGJ7DOV5CQQXFPOZCXTRD6W4BEPT4Q/
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> >   - Proplery format revert commits
> >   - Add code comment to remind of this issue
> >   - Add Fixes tags
> > 
> > Nicolas Saenz Julienne (3):
> >   staging: vchiq_2835_arm: revert "quit using custom
> >     down_interruptible()"
> >   staging: vchiq: revert "switch to wait_for_completion_killable"
> >   staging: vchiq: make wait events interruptible
> > 
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c      |  2 +-
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           | 21 +++++++------
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c          | 31 ++++++++++++-------
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c          |  6 ++--
> >  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> against which tree should this series apply?
> 
> Since the merge window opened the current staging-linus wont be
> available soon.

I don't know if that's what you meant, but I guess we should wait for 5.2-rc1
and then push it, the fixes will eventually get into the stable version of 5.1.


Regards,
Nicolas


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]