From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl (ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl [195.121.94.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE263630B5 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.186 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781209244; cv=none; b=PLOuRQ29sCi3g0lVCYvREm7UKvm3U3dqK4Z2UNuwSETXJTf1v2wBx0srbmck0ieCfc/YBo49O8tHgfOJjy0DKmffTqVuth668iUjrxLTiqSvvKyaFWabi47QywNMj8x+b0w9mys8p0hZB395aWPqc1ELUkSS1Lz6erzHyv+qtJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781209244; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IfG67A0Jts04cIyLa6fhWJ/W0y/x9wyazXUwF0PGq4M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pltNhaTCAa8i/4KNhKlDYff6wvxZ8JeBXq8Oc3NmY2Y+Sh4fydR6p00fy4AUztGxCUsjROK3v82jHXICy+paWe5elpGOhwYmy7vH3u9/4d+apDd6ZGscJ+IGzKkZvJcJj8pWsyus7PEq3M0b7cMWeHPe5uaRVF8kev+0CvcfJVg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b=RgDw+MVc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.186 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b="RgDw+MVc" X-KPN-MessageId: 04558366-65d3-11f1-89f6-00505699b430 Received: from mta.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.31.161.188]) by ewsoutbound.so.kpn.org (Halon) with ESMTPS id 04558366-65d3-11f1-89f6-00505699b430; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.128.135.189]) by mta.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTP id 044b386a-65d3-11f1-8109-00505699693e; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:20:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=xs4all01; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:from:date; bh=7Ov7v2zaUsKQyd+rQc7yHadKIpzutEorLHTRrcpiUAo=; b=RgDw+MVc2Qet1WgQwtwcnUZt759tDJ+oBErf1U5+xxQXgYdSi9SgynxGFHwp88+Bp3hzAHLcSsMew V8llfjnNJEfIdDC1CFT4WtTuOIf5l0nbga67AWw5CK1Jk3EepHRHVvLTX5ICv6quZeRarmiQGvaVpr yT6QotuxyIBfZ9aGqMXQM1uG8M6yjdj+pH8BTRB3PTEneTPF+ZeZKIPqnrrf2sVVQSD7vRK26FqTND 97nfbc9QLbuSDyQsTXBnhNKJ3N73jDS7HVQ9imyQTOc+lLeqdfI0Jif21iPvh5pAuqTDHVMzCQMw+1 yAIxXzz0hj4MPZAsoyPGXb7qn57SWvw== X-KPN-MID: 33|7XIYT4gxVhC2i/73hxusug8E0GT0kcO29eJp2Bj7UXh4xb7Ln30W17f35CgeKdd IjSlghudXmXnd+7EsEXsJJce4g9x5RyrsVcMa8yPOY9w= X-CMASSUN: 33|2flxrK3KgCTfwfptdl/FAJyaW4hmG4aJpTZ72iFSgo6mcrufPWXugh29k5gnRxs 72ag8Y40U0E6BGk8ufU+Ngg== X-KPN-VerifiedSender: Yes Received: from cpxoxapps-mh04 (cpxoxapps-mh04.personalcloud.so.kpn.org [10.128.135.210]) by mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 043ffc09-65d3-11f1-94b1-00505699eff2; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:20:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Jori Koolstra To: Jan Kara Cc: Christian Brauner , Steve French , Steve French , Al Viro , NeilBrown , Jeff Layton , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <987538907.1434294.1781209240897@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <7iocwlr7jg2jiyx53q7lxaccrybu6fpv6ch36u64igdmddafdk@3ejeqvr4e7rh> References: <20260611145733.43776-1-jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> <7iocwlr7jg2jiyx53q7lxaccrybu6fpv6ch36u64igdmddafdk@3ejeqvr4e7rh> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] vfs: pass S_IFDIR mode to vfs_prepare_mode() Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Hi Jan, > Op 11-06-2026 17:33 CEST schreef Jan Kara : > > For the filesystems I know this looks sound. Thanks for the cleanup. But > this series should then follow with the removal of now-pointless "| > S_IFDIR" statements. > Right, perhaps it should. But wouldn't that be too much churn? I know Al can really be on the brake sometimes with regards to that. But it isn't a lot of effort, so I am fine with it. Best, Jori.