mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
To: dima@arista.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Bob Gilligan <gilligan@arista.com>,
	Salam Noureddine <noureddine@arista.com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: Destroy TCP-AO, TCP-MD5 keys in .sk_destruct()
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:40:01 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98c5d450-e766-45cd-a300-bbeaf31cb0b9@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250822-b4-tcp-ao-md5-rst-finwait2-v1-1-25825d085dcb@arista.com>

On 8/22/25 01:55, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> 
> Currently there are a couple of minor issues with destroying the keys
> tcp_v4_destroy_sock():
> 
> 1. The socket is yet in TCP bind buckets, making it reachable for
>     incoming segments [on another CPU core], potentially available to send
>     late FIN/ACK/RST replies.
> 
> 2. There is at least one code path, where tcp_done() is called before
>     sending RST [kudos to Bob for investigation]. This is a case of
>     a server, that finished sending its data and just called close().
> 
>     The socket is in TCP_FIN_WAIT2 and has RCV_SHUTDOWN (set by
>     __tcp_close())
> 
>     tcp_v4_do_rcv()/tcp_v6_do_rcv()
>       tcp_rcv_state_process()            /* LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA */
>         tcp_reset()
>           tcp_done_with_error()
>             tcp_done()
>               inet_csk_destroy_sock()    /* Destroys AO/MD5 keys */
>       /* tcp_rcv_state_process() returns SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_DATA */
>     tcp_v4_send_reset()                  /* Sends an unsigned RST segment */
> 
>     tcpdump:
>> 22:53:15.399377 00:00:b2:1f:00:00 > 00:00:01:01:00:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 33929, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
>>      1.0.0.1.34567 > 1.0.0.2.49848: Flags [F.], seq 2185658590, ack 3969644355, win 502, options [nop,nop,md5 valid], length 0
>> 22:53:15.399396 00:00:01:01:00:00 > 00:00:b2:1f:00:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 86: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 51951, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 72)
>>      1.0.0.2.49848 > 1.0.0.1.34567: Flags [.], seq 3969644375, ack 2185658591, win 128, options [nop,nop,md5 valid,nop,nop,sack 1 {2185658590:2185658591}], length 0
>> 22:53:16.429588 00:00:b2:1f:00:00 > 00:00:01:01:00:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
>>      1.0.0.1.34567 > 1.0.0.2.49848: Flags [R], seq 2185658590, win 0, length 0
>> 22:53:16.664725 00:00:b2:1f:00:00 > 00:00:01:01:00:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
>>      1.0.0.1.34567 > 1.0.0.2.49848: Flags [R], seq 2185658591, win 0, options [nop,nop,md5 valid], length 0
>> 22:53:17.289832 00:00:b2:1f:00:00 > 00:00:01:01:00:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
>>      1.0.0.1.34567 > 1.0.0.2.49848: Flags [R], seq 2185658591, win 0, options [nop,nop,md5 valid], length 0
> 
>    Note the signed RSTs later in the dump - those are sent by the server
>    when the fin-wait socket gets removed from hash buckets, by
>    the listener socket.
> 
> Instead of destroying AO/MD5 info and their keys in inet_csk_destroy_sock(),
> slightly delay it until the actual socket .sk_destruct(). As shutdown'ed
> socket can yet send non-data replies, they should be signed in order for
> the peer to process them. Now it also matches how AO/MD5 gets destructed
> for TIME-WAIT sockets (in tcp_twsk_destructor()).
> 
> This seems optimal for TCP-MD5, while for TCP-AO it seems to have an
> open problem: once RST get sent and socket gets actually destructed,
> there is no information on the initial sequence numbers. So, in case
> this last RST gets lost in the network, the server's listener socket
> won't be able to properly sign another RST. Nothing in RFC 1122
> prescribes keeping any local state after non-graceful reset.
> Luckily, BGP are known to use keep alive(s).
> 
> While the issue is quite minor/cosmetic, these days monitoring network
> counters is a common practice and getting invalid signed segments from
> a trusted BGP peer can get customers worried.
> 
> Investigated-by: Bob Gilligan <gilligan@arista.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> ---
>   net/ipv4/tcp.c      | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 25 -------------------------
>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 71a956fbfc5533224ee00e792de2cfdccd4d40aa..4e996e937e8e5f0e75764caa24240e25006deece 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,36 @@ static u64 tcp_compute_delivery_rate(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
>   	return rate64;
>   }
> [...]
> +
> +static void tcp_destruct_sock(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);

It looks like this variable is unused when CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG is not set 

and this is causing the test CI build to fail.

net/ipv4/tcp.c: In function ‘tcp_destruct_sock’:
net/ipv4/tcp.c:417:26: error: unused variable ‘tp’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
   417 |         struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
       |                          ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: net/ipv4/tcp.

cheers,
Victor

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-22 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  4:55 [PATCH net-next 0/2] " Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
2025-08-22  4:55 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] " Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
2025-08-22 12:40   ` Victor Nogueira [this message]
2025-08-22 18:05     ` Dmitry Safonov
2025-08-22 19:24   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-22  4:55 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
2025-08-22  9:08 ` [syzbot ci] Re: tcp: Destroy TCP-AO, TCP-MD5 keys in .sk_destruct() syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98c5d450-e766-45cd-a300-bbeaf31cb0b9@mojatatu.com \
    --to=victor@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gilligan@arista.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noureddine@arista.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®