From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932845AbcBCUPz (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:15:55 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.161.196]:35518 "EHLO mail-yw0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932793AbcBCUPu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:15:50 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 70153 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:15:50 EST From: William Breathitt Gray To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Use devm_request_region Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:15:21 -0500 Message-Id: <98d3cf3c17e833e825f4a58d442339995fca8379.1454530144.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.4.10 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org By the time request_region is called in the ACCES 104-DIO-48E GPIO driver, a corresponding device structure has already been allocated. The devm_request_region function should be used to help simplify the cleanup code and reduce the possible points of failure. Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot --- drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c | 25 ++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c index 279de39..b144bc9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(dio_48e_irq, "ACCES 104-DIO-48E interrupt line number"); * @control: Control registers state * @lock: synchronization lock to prevent I/O race conditions * @base: base port address of the GPIO device - * @extent: extent of port address region of the GPIO device * @irq: Interrupt line number * @irq_mask: I/O bits affected by interrupts */ @@ -51,7 +50,6 @@ struct dio48e_gpio { unsigned char control[2]; spinlock_t lock; unsigned base; - unsigned extent; unsigned irq; unsigned char irq_mask; }; @@ -310,11 +308,10 @@ static int __init dio48e_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!dio48egpio) return -ENOMEM; - if (!request_region(base, extent, name)) { - dev_err(dev, "Unable to lock %s port addresses (0x%X-0x%X)\n", - name, base, base + extent); - err = -EBUSY; - goto err_lock_io_port; + if (!devm_request_region(dev, base, extent, name)) { + dev_err(dev, "Unable to lock port addresses (0x%X-0x%X)\n", + base, base + extent); + return -EBUSY; } dio48egpio->chip.label = name; @@ -328,7 +325,6 @@ static int __init dio48e_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dio48egpio->chip.get = dio48e_gpio_get; dio48egpio->chip.set = dio48e_gpio_set; dio48egpio->base = base; - dio48egpio->extent = extent; dio48egpio->irq = irq; spin_lock_init(&dio48egpio->lock); @@ -338,7 +334,7 @@ static int __init dio48e_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) err = gpiochip_add_data(&dio48egpio->chip, dio48egpio); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "GPIO registering failed (%d)\n", err); - goto err_gpio_register; + return err; } /* initialize all GPIO as output */ @@ -360,23 +356,19 @@ static int __init dio48e_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "Could not add irqchip (%d)\n", err); - goto err_gpiochip_irqchip_add; + goto err_gpiochip_remove; } err = request_irq(irq, dio48e_irq_handler, 0, name, dio48egpio); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "IRQ handler registering failed (%d)\n", err); - goto err_request_irq; + goto err_gpiochip_remove; } return 0; -err_request_irq: -err_gpiochip_irqchip_add: +err_gpiochip_remove: gpiochip_remove(&dio48egpio->chip); -err_gpio_register: - release_region(base, extent); -err_lock_io_port: return err; } @@ -386,7 +378,6 @@ static int dio48e_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) free_irq(dio48egpio->irq, dio48egpio); gpiochip_remove(&dio48egpio->chip); - release_region(dio48egpio->base, dio48egpio->extent); return 0; } -- 2.4.10