From: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
To: Liu Dalin <liudalin@kylinsec.com.cn>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Deng Yingchao <dengyingchao@kylinsec.com.cn>,
Qin Yungao <qinyungao@kylinsec.com.cn>,
Luo Qiu <luoqiu@kylinsec.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/s390/pci: fix fixup_user_fault() calls with NULL unlocked parameter
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 17:25:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98f11271b6574aa945755f073a3bcec8f69a02e9.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0726CF177011E0E2+20260826064228.3255764-1-liudalin@kylinsec.com.cn>
On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 14:42 +0800, Liu Dalin wrote:
> The s390 PCI MMIO functions call fixup_user_fault() with the 'unlocked'
> parameter set to NULL. This means when handle_mm_fault() returns
> VM_FAULT_COMPLETED or VM_FAULT_RETRY, the function re-acquires the
> mmap_lock but cannot notify the caller about this state change.
Hi Liu,
I'm far from being a mm-expert, but from reading the function
description of fixup_user_fault() in mm/gup.c I believe that mmap_lock
is unlocked *only* if retries are allowed by way of setting the
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY. Otherwise, the unlocked parameter is allowed to
be NULL.
Since s390_pci_mmio_write()/_read() calls fixup_user_fault() without
the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY flag, I thought your patch is not needed.
But then I got concerned about the comment in the handling of the
VM_FAULT_COMPLETED return from handle_mm_fault() - which got introduced
with commit d92725256b4f ("mm: avoid unnecessary page fault retires on
shared memory types") without changing the documentation of the
unlocked parameter of fixup_user_fault().
I'm under the impression, that so far we saw
s390_pci_mmio_write()/_read() only in use on VMAs that ended in EFAULT?
But that's a question to @Matt and/or @Niklas...
> This is problematic because the caller subsequently calls
> mmap_read_unlock() at the end of the function. If the lock was
> re-acquired inside fixup_user_fault(), the unlock happens correctly.
> But passing NULL makes the code fragile and hard to reason about.
For a full solution, this would have to make the call to
mmap_read_lock() dependent on unlocked being true at the end of both
sys-calls.
>
> Fix this by providing a proper 'unlocked' variable to fixup_user_fault()
> so the lock state is properly tracked.
>
> This is a follow-up to the defensive NULL check added in fixup_user_fault()
> by the previous patch in this series.
>
> Fixes: 41a0926e82f4 ("s390/pci: Fix s390_mmio_read/write syscall page fault handling")
> Signed-off-by: Liu Dalin <liudalin@kylinsec.com.cn>
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> index f3f79ba78410..5ef2d6436d4b 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> args.vma = vma;
> ret = follow_pfnmap_start(&args);
> if (ret) {
> - fixup_user_fault(current->mm, mmio_addr, FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, NULL);
> + bool unlocked = false;
> +
> + fixup_user_fault(current->mm, mmio_addr, FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, &unlocked);
> ret = follow_pfnmap_start(&args);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock_mmap;
> @@ -335,7 +337,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> args.address = mmio_addr;
> ret = follow_pfnmap_start(&args);
> if (ret) {
> - fixup_user_fault(current->mm, mmio_addr, 0, NULL);
> + bool unlocked = false;
> +
> + fixup_user_fault(current->mm, mmio_addr, 0, &unlocked);
> ret = follow_pfnmap_start(&args);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock_mmap;
Thank you,
Gerd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 6:42 Liu Dalin
2026-09-07 15:25 ` Gerd Bayer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98f11271b6574aa945755f073a3bcec8f69a02e9.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengyingchao@kylinsec.com.cn \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liudalin@kylinsec.com.cn \
--cc=luoqiu@kylinsec.com.cn \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qinyungao@kylinsec.com.cn \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®