From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CB1C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1359705AbiFPIle (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:41:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58564 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1359695AbiFPIla (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:41:30 -0400 Received: from esa2.hgst.iphmx.com (esa2.hgst.iphmx.com [68.232.143.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF0F5DA45 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:41:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1655368889; x=1686904889; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q0nV+Y6VnyjEkRNkFfq754W33G/B/8foeyIm/WzodEc=; b=Yogodyi7KNgyIJjJrsyrhbQfEqcj+0c5I0AmlaLSapbr48V+2bqAsb/K C0n87GIbZOGf1gLFRmhiNU/7qdLO5x5WmvVy2NMnWBmuuB/D2skUoWrO7 rlaSn4TKQwlKJtB45sPIP8FzCVIKfvDo715K+ZS7GSMJM2taMWCYNDLUy IXxyQyO8UQXC749HDd5pPictAu+sCj3qCT9vz/9+0tayWqk5VzeO5VyOz yfFHPsRAppNoBMNNBYSYugG43d/IxA3RWLvwEzOFCjNX7kRUwls1AVEgt X9MfwZRgltwWVixjRoGSWxIYHARQKuk+p0JzClo+wLC77m2n4t/IV8tay w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,304,1647273600"; d="scan'208";a="307610373" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2022 16:41:27 +0800 IronPort-SDR: KkE3X+wqxNPJJYIW+aOtvxwr5e9yUtTsPQ+6kb1CmmULLN/VNzTCY+8UJMfmo/De4HvJqSBGfm GZG9aNYR5AVuDOHPAPZly5n3J6GJdmqntLjbO2agutUFkucfQx4dJeLtt3joWH/IBrRZf8pKhH UlYKdRyQkQM5HOawB9n0SCKqLVDdZX4Oe0kQQaH6YffEJuEJxKILMMH6dKZR0VhOhZFe8nnNCC 7aTg0zXaOWhBNBeB+BWHkQpLlUmDsYcinZunwzgtLiVioRXC6vVS/aoZrhZlgyjMiSKCBPn7pL R8ZUCyo9EjSKPHYHxoiZXau2 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 16 Jun 2022 01:04:03 -0700 IronPort-SDR: UyddNqGWL7tyvheLYVlP0Gewmi/ERd3w+rdm9GNB7PZ3DUvB24V+H/wHkDTcwabFghve9ny9VH FN2pdCCWuhizQw567b5HhjHYTWEJ8aY0yMx3S8A7wmExRNKJaDxWRUTir5y8RWd11oYOkRKOK5 TOQja7Xi3Pn95mFDGEJUXaPnAlBniJU+81KYbQ2wih/oif6hWpS646sGXNVKHqweLqmVYIE/7C Aly67XGF3x8BtAZSMBPPEt3pSrW15fmqjEyx8fh/aOcmzAqshIYsb5b6+y0IokNiy4oTiStn4C eQM= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([10.3.10.180]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 16 Jun 2022 01:41:27 -0700 Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LNwd23y1Nz1SHwl for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Authentication-Results: usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=opensource.wdc.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= opensource.wdc.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1655368885; x=1657960886; bh=q0nV+Y6VnyjEkRNkFfq754W33G/B/8foeyI m/WzodEc=; b=lY2eNfwJepGYRRIkNfUhDQNf2aTX2nUbwF6BrJipPQ9yPTzMexN yJM+8bSHjUqGz9M6S9zi1R/EpGFwQ2oTpxi0zmUGxM/1OTCR0XDxJagn3rbAIQaK H/OoEJT2aeE33MlJEu2ZOgNobrdvsL8rPqkXBnd9t4mCdpmAYbeMmSRd5asXRp5i Ammxbmw055cUDp9a8K7e7esVWgx4k98tjKYBvFVbW/0BeXkao8AYTOHuV2AncjS6 jyKA/cOQah/OPBC3Xf0uCux4EG16CBabME9+5FRIHEVO2P5t+No3UQI0NOKOAX53 EdOHS5o/AloU8ZwV+w+HsqtEHWRzdz0USZA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id x1SKb50lHbee for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.89.84.185] (c02drav6md6t.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com [10.89.84.185]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LNwcz1dffz1Rvlc; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98fa010d-3555-a82b-e960-f47aeeb38151@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:41:21 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/18] scsi: core: Implement reserved command handling Content-Language: en-US To: John Garry , Bart Van Assche , axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, brking@us.ibm.com, hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com References: <1654770559-101375-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1654770559-101375-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <9e89360d-3325-92af-0436-b34df748f3e2@acm.org> <3a27b6ff-e495-8f11-6925-1487c9d14fa9@huawei.com> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/06/16 17:24, John Garry wrote: > On 16/06/2022 03:47, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>>> so going backward several years... That internal tag for ATA does not >>>> need to be reserved since this command is always used when the drive is >>>> idle and no other NCQ commands are on-going. >>> >>> So do you mean that ATA_TAG_INTERNAL qc is used for other commands >>> apart from internal commands? >> >> No. It is used only for internal commands. What I meant to say is that >> currently, internal commands are issued only on device scan, device >> revalidate and error handling. All of these phases are done with the >> device under EH with the issuing path stopped and all commands >> completed, > > If I want to allocate a request for an ATA internal command then could I > use 1x from the regular tags? I didn't think that this was possible as I > thought that all tags may be outstanding when EH kicks in. I need to > double check it. When EH kicks in, the drive is in error mode and all commands are back to the host. From there, you need to get the drive out of error mode with read log 10h and then internal commands can be issued if needed. Then the aborted commands that are not in error are restarted. For the non-error case (revalidate), ap->ops->qc_defer() will make sure that NCQ and non-NCQ commands are never mixed. Since all internal commands are non-ncq, when an internal command is issued, there are necessarily no other commands ongoing, but 32 NCQ commands may be waiting, without any free tag. The internal command being non-NCQ can still proceed since it does not need a real device tag. The joy of ATA... > Even if it were true, not using a reserved tag for ATA internal command > makes things more tricky as this command requires special handling for > scsi blk_mq_ops and there is no easy way to identify the command as > reserved (to know special handling is required). Yes. Having the ATA_TAG_INTERNAL tag as a reserved tag is fine. But from the above, you can see that this is not really needed at all to make things work. The management of ATA_TAG_INTERNAL as a reserve tag is really about getting your API to simplify the code. What I am thinking is that with your patches as is, it seems that we can never actually reserve a real tag for ATA to do internal NCQ commands... We do not really need that for now though, apart maybe for speeding up device revalidate. Everytime that one runs, one can see a big spike in read/write IO latencies because of the queue drain it causes. And for CDL 0xD policy error handling, I may need a reserved NCQ tag... Still trying to work out qc/tag reuse for now though. > >> so no regular commands can be issued. Only internal ones, non >> NCQ, using the ATA_TAG_INTERNAL. So strictly speaking, we should not >> need to reserve that internal tag at all. >> > > Thanks, > John > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research