From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:17:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:17:13 -0400 Received: from smtp-rt-14.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.224]:64159 "EHLO adansonia.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:17:06 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux scalability? From: "reiser.angus" To: Sasi Peter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 18 May 2001 10:12:34 +0200 Message-Id: <990173560.6346.0.camel@adslgw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement > holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already > suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets beaten > by IIS 5.0 (8001), and these were measured on the same kind of box! not really the same box look at the disk subsystem 7 x 9GB 10KRPM Drives and 1 x 18GB 15KRPM (html+log & os) for Win2000 5 x 9GB 10KRPM Drives (html+log+os) for TUX 2.0 this is sufficient for a such difference -David