From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:35:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:35:34 -0400 Received: from smtp-rt-14.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.224]:19135 "EHLO adansonia.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:35:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux scalability? From: "reiser.angus" To: Ronald Bultje Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <990174686.12881.18.camel@tux.bitfreak.net> In-Reply-To: <990173560.6346.0.camel@adslgw> <990174686.12881.18.camel@tux.bitfreak.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 18 May 2001 10:30:40 +0200 Message-Id: <990174642.6347.1.camel@adslgw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I read an article about TUX in the dutch C'T a few months ago (nov/dec > 2000, I think) - the real difference (according to the article) was the > 2.2.x kernel used in TUX. Look at the stats of the website, they used > Redhat 7.0 as base, with kernel 2.2.16. TUX does not exist on 2.2 kernel They use a RedHat 7.0 with a 2.4 kernel patched by RedHat (with TUX, zerocopy, etc..) -David