From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0F2C43334 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232279AbiFYHsE (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 03:48:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57858 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232214AbiFYHsC (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 03:48:02 -0400 Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (mail.cn.fujitsu.com [183.91.158.132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497D4766B; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 00:48:01 -0700 (PDT) IronPort-Data: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3AOqzWBawl0SE/16uGJqt6t+ejxCrEfRIJ4+MujC/?= =?us-ascii?q?XYbTApDJ202QEm2obDWDTa6uDZmCmctl/a4Xi8h5QsJbWytZlHQtv/xmBbVoQ9?= =?us-ascii?q?5OdWo7xwmQcns+qBpSaChohtq3yU/GYRCwPZiKa9kfF3oTJ9yEmj/nSHuOkUYY?= =?us-ascii?q?oBwgqLeNaYHZ44f5cs75h6mJYqYDR7zKl4bsekeWGULOW82Ic3lYv1k62gEgHU?= =?us-ascii?q?MIeF98vlgdWifhj5DcynpSOZX4VDfnZw3DQGuG4EgMmLtsvwo1V/kuBl/ssIti?= =?us-ascii?q?j1LjmcEwWWaOUNg+L4pZUc/H6xEEc+WppieBmXBYfQR4/ZzGhm9FjyNRPtJW2Y?= =?us-ascii?q?Qk0PKzQg/lbWB5de817FfQcpe6dcSnh7KR/yGWDKRMA2c5GB0E7O4IJ/ftfBWB?= =?us-ascii?q?I6OxeITQMZBmJjqS9x7fTYvhlgMY+Ko/5PJ43vnBm0CGfAfs4KbjDSqzJ4tke1?= =?us-ascii?q?io/ic1mGuzXbM4ULzFoaXzoZxxJJ0dSC58kmuqsrmfwficeq1+Po6czpW/Jw2R?= =?us-ascii?q?Z1LnrLcqQYNCPTO1LkUuC4GHL5WL0BlcdLtP34TiK/Vq+h+LXkGXwUeov+BeQn?= =?us-ascii?q?hJxqATLgDVNV1tNDh3mycRVQ3WWA7p3Q3H4MAJ3xUTqyHGWcw=3D=3D?= IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3AORbPwaC00HxatujlHemQ55DYdb4zR+YMi2TD?= =?us-ascii?q?tnoBLSC9F/b0qynAppomPGDP4gr5NEtApTniAtjkfZq/z+8X3WB5B97LMzUO01?= =?us-ascii?q?HYTr2Kg7GD/xTQXwX69sN4kZxrarVCDrTLZmRSvILX5xaZHr8brOW6zA=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,333,1635177600"; d="scan'208";a="125928965" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2022 15:47:59 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1234D17168; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:47:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD08.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.83) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:47:58 +0800 Received: from [192.168.122.212] (10.167.226.45) by G08CNEXCHPEKD08.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:47:58 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: Fix no completion event issue To: Jason Gunthorpe CC: Yanjun Zhu , Haakon Bugge , Cheng Xu , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20220516015329.445474-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com> <20220624233953.GG23621@ziepe.ca> From: "Li, Zhijian" Message-ID: <9929cea8-df14-77f8-2686-94f851233782@fujitsu.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:47:57 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220624233953.GG23621@ziepe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 2E1234D17168.AC392 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: lizhijian@fujitsu.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on 6/25/2022 7:39 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:32:40AM +0000, lizhijian@fujitsu.com wrote: >> Hi Json & Yanjun >> >> >> I know there are still a few regressions on RXE, but i do wish you >> could take some time to review these *simple and bugfix* patches >> They are not related to the regressions. > I would like someone familiar with rxe to ack the datapath changes Thanks for your feedback Haakon Bugge  had reviewed the datapath changes except the commit log in the V1 patches privately for some reasons weeks ago. Hey Haakon, could you help to review these patches. > - I have a very limited knowledge about rxe. > > If that is not forthcoming from others in the rxe community then I > will accept confirmation directly from you that the pyverbs tests and > the blktests scenarios have been run and pass for your changes. it's confirmed that pyverbs tests and nvme group with RXE of blktests have no regression after these changes Thanks Zhijian > > Jason