From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753446AbYFWXOu (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:14:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751245AbYFWXOk (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:14:40 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.230]:35421 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905AbYFWXOj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:14:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hO0zrzTwsIalXuE5JDpWqpG+kgWX5UDEtO7gVYcHPPpukNEi6+qi5KC1mSzf4HvCtR Pp+a8V6DmJI34LY8ivNzDNiXgCcOnHKa09y9m0Cl431Bxn5S9BfbNsejkoklo4ImtLXi zNoFVsnJWqFVf2q3990eIK0K2JBvl0bnQXHGY= Message-ID: <9929d2390806231614j66b51d01v103b7dc4efd81b38@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:14:39 -0700 From: "Jeff Kirsher" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] e1000e: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 defconfigs Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net In-Reply-To: <20080623112618.GC7485@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080622221916.5907.79563.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20080623112618.GC7485@elte.hu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e9c7e44215bb5fd2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jeff Kirsher wrote: > >> From: Auke Kok >> >> This adds to the already default CONFIG_E1000=y in these files. >> >> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher >> --- >> >> arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig | 1 + >> arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 + > > that is not an e1000 patch but an arch/x86 defconfig patch. NAK on this > route of patch propagation. > So you are fine with the patch contents, just not the title/subject line. So if the subject line was: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] x86 defconfig: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 defconfigs Would that have been alright? -- Cheers, Jeff