From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754251AbYIWWMy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:12:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751452AbYIWWMp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:12:45 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:46031 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbYIWWMo (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:12:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=O+kRslnApAHlWdQacjE9vNwkq3cJZWPHgzLOBNRiMTxLtUyaFGQTdkOmm8ichXBqZV +Hu5/QJRya1QJgfg0nGT0yCppXdDPE6HaGY+f50pjOX8kfm3MfeHk7FGUFasuG8RcXXT TgGj4soA3Nqrb5JsrtaD3koPkX0UbylCT7oyc= Message-ID: <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:12:43 -0700 From: "Jeff Kirsher" To: "David Miller" Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Cc: airlied@gmail.com, jkosina@suse.cz, david.vrabel@csr.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, chrisl@vmware.com In-Reply-To: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080923.140519.268233735.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220@mail.gmail.com> <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 21da3f72bde522c2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:07 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Jiri Kosina >> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) >> > >> >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: >> >> >> >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. >> >> >> >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled >> >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. >> > >> > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches >> > or recent X server. >> > >> >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? > -- OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. -- Cheers, Jeff