mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	Jan Sokolowski <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>,
	<jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i40e (gcc13): synchronize allocate/free functions return type & values
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:51:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9942e904-6f96-5ff5-34d6-7756add65c0a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fb6ba13-3300-917a-4e7b-e8b7a1e71e45@kernel.org>

On 12/12/2022 3:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04. 11. 22, 21:28, Tony Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/4/2022 11:47 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:33:07 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
>>>> As Jiri mentioned, this is propagated up throughout the driver. We 
>>>> could
>>>> change this function to return int but all the callers would then need
>>>> to convert these errors to i40e_status to propagate. This doesn't 
>>>> really
>>>> gain much other than having this function return int. To adjust the
>>>> entire call chain is going to take more work. As this is resolving a
>>>> valid warning and returning what is currently expected, what are your
>>>> thoughts on taking this now to resolve the issue and our i40e team will
>>>> take the work on to convert the functions to use the standard errnos?
>>>
>>> My thoughts on your OS abstraction layers should be pretty evident.
>>> If anything I'd like to be more vigilant about less flagrant cases.
>>>
>>> I don't think this is particularly difficult, let's patch it up
>>> best we can without letting the "status" usage grow.
>>
>> Ok thanks will do.
> 
> Just heads-up: have you managed to remove the abstraction yet?


Hi Jiri,

It's being worked on: 
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20221207144800.1257060-1-jan.sokolowski@intel.com/

Thanks,
Tony

      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-31 11:44 Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2022-11-03  3:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 12:03   ` Jiri Slaby
2022-11-04 18:33     ` Tony Nguyen
2022-11-04 18:47       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 20:28         ` Tony Nguyen
2022-12-12 11:55           ` Jiri Slaby
2022-12-12 17:51             ` Tony Nguyen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9942e904-6f96-5ff5-34d6-7756add65c0a@intel.com \
    --to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jan.sokolowski@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®