From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BD7C433FE for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233281AbiKVJRz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 04:17:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232654AbiKVJRq (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 04:17:46 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDD926F3; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:17:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1669108659; x=1700644659; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ju1JyQTn92u4HvUI5+WxNM5kNBlJYD4Eh6lJkA3+1pw=; b=Oq7BQn6mlzlbISruwZjrEh64CH5T406xTR7b15XneT/bR8CZHbq4mO2d OIUI2IsjcsvkSDuGtURO0WZRmX+Hbxb4rgMzLDJwudNVp36hmtEWmwg5J 36u2ODg2aO9rKJNH/mQ0g+B0TQOcBtOI8uhgKVvvNIUI06XRXgQh0PU/R gScHhomVK1dTQmMGBXg1hGBSZ2co4T0QjIjyRbfO2W3uGBttlkWP/2KPr gKWtmhjc8zl1DcMSd/32fK43ilX44hUn6WXDP2uUJPJmZ0FWjJLl9z3ke 0Tyox/3RM3Zf3mPyNhH0kljMkAOozPMezEo3V0HQtgku4T4TnVimVLaSz A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,183,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="188113651" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa2.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 22 Nov 2022 02:17:28 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:17:26 -0700 Received: from den-dk-m31857.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:17:23 -0700 Message-ID: <994f72742a15bec5a93d57324b749b71d0709035.camel@microchip.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] Add support for VCAP debugFS in Sparx5 From: Steen Hegelund To: Jakub Kicinski CC: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , , Randy Dunlap , "Casper Andersson" , Russell King , Wan Jiabing , "Nathan Huckleberry" , , , , "Daniel Machon" , Horatiu Vultur , Lars Povlsen Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:17:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20221121110154.709bed49@kernel.org> References: <20221117213114.699375-1-steen.hegelund@microchip.com> <20221121110154.709bed49@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jacub, On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 11:01 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know th= e > content is safe >=20 > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:31:06 +0100 Steen Hegelund wrote: > > This provides support for getting VCAP instance, VCAP rule and VCAP por= t > > keyset configuration information via the debug file system. >=20 > Have you checked devlink dpipe? On a quick scan it may be the right API > to use here? Perhaps this was merged before people who know the code > had a chance to take a look :( No I was not aware of the scope of devlink-dpipe, but it looks like the Spa= rx5 VCAP feature would fit in. I need to take a closer look at the model and see if I can make ends meet, = but if so, then I could send support for devlink-dpipe at a later stage... BR Steen