From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: in tpm2_del_space check if ops pointer is still valid
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:22:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <995b242a-d8ec-9310-d272-960b3f025115@kunbus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBn5kwEIoggc71xY@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 03.02.21 02:17, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:09:03PM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
>>
>> In tpm2_del_space() the sessions are flushed by means of the tpm_chip
>> operations. However the concerning operations pointer my already be NULL at
> ~~
> may
>
> What is "concerniog operations"? Unfamiliar term. Maybe just consistently
> se chip->ops? Now you have also "tpm_chip operations" and chip->ops, in
> addition to "concerning operations" in one paragraph commit message.
'concerning' referred to 'operations pointer'. But yes, using multiple times
a different term for the same thing is quite confusing. I will fix this.
>> this time in case that the chip has been unregistered (see
>> tpm_chip_unregister() which calls tpm_del_char_device() which sets
>> chip->ops to NULL).
>> Before accessing chip->ops check if it is still valid. Skip flushing
>> the sessions in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
>
> Instead of cross referencing please describe the scenario (i.e.
> the sequence of operations) of failure.
>
> Fixes tag is also missing.
>
Right, will add it.
Thanks,
Lino
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 22:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] TPM fixes Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03 1:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:06 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03 21:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tpm: Provide a function tpm_chip_free() to free tpm chips Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03 1:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:09 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: in tpm2_del_space check if ops pointer is still valid Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03 1:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:22 ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=995b242a-d8ec-9310-d272-960b3f025115@kunbus.com \
--to=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®