mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: in tpm2_del_space check if ops pointer is still valid
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:22:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <995b242a-d8ec-9310-d272-960b3f025115@kunbus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBn5kwEIoggc71xY@kernel.org>

Hi,

On 03.02.21 02:17, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:09:03PM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
>>
>> In tpm2_del_space() the sessions are flushed by means of the tpm_chip
>> operations. However the concerning operations pointer my already be NULL at
>                                                         ~~
>                                                         may
> 
> What is "concerniog operations"? Unfamiliar term. Maybe just consistently
> se chip->ops? Now you have also "tpm_chip operations" and chip->ops, in
> addition to "concerning operations" in one paragraph commit message.

'concerning' referred to 'operations pointer'. But yes, using multiple times
 a different term for the same thing is quite confusing. I will fix this. 

>> this time in case that the chip has been unregistered (see
>> tpm_chip_unregister() which calls tpm_del_char_device() which sets
>> chip->ops to NULL).
>> Before accessing chip->ops check if it is still valid. Skip flushing
>> the sessions in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> 
> Instead of cross referencing please describe the scenario (i.e.
> the sequence of operations) of failure.
> 
> Fixes tag is also missing.
> 

Right, will add it.

Thanks,
Lino

      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 22:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] TPM fixes Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03  1:09   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:06     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03 21:43       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tpm: Provide a function tpm_chip_free() to free tpm chips Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03  1:28   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:09     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: in tpm2_del_space check if ops pointer is still valid Lino Sanfilippo
2021-02-03  1:17   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 14:22     ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=995b242a-d8ec-9310-d272-960b3f025115@kunbus.com \
    --to=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
    --cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®