From: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: HACHIMI Samir <shachimi@adeneo-embedded.com>,
shawn guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
thierry reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:31:58 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <996111492.3799131.1346956318651.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346935695-25179-8-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On Thursday, September 6, 2012 2:48:13 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
>
> The i.MX pwm core has two clocks: The ipg clock and the ipg highfreq
> (peripheral) clock. The ipg clock has to be enabled for this hardware
> to work. The actual pwm output can either be driven by the ipg clock
> or the ipg highfreq. The ipg highfreq has the advantage that it runs
> even when the SoC is in low power modes.
> This patch requests both clocks and enables the ipg clock for
> accessing
> registers and the peripheral clock to actually turn on the pwm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index ea4ab2c..d45d44f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,8 @@
> #define MX3_PWMCR_EN (1 << 0)
>
> struct imx_chip {
> - struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk *clk_per;
> + struct clk *clk_ipg;
>
> int enabled;
> void __iomem *mmio_base;
> @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> *chip,
> unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale;
> u32 cr;
>
> - c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk);
> + c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
> c = c * period_ns;
> do_div(c, 1000000000);
> period_cycles = c;
> @@ -160,8 +161,17 @@ static int imx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> {
> struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - return imx->config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
> + ret = imx->config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int imx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> *pwm)
> @@ -169,7 +179,7 @@ static int imx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm)
> struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> int ret;
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
Have you tested that this actually works on i.MX53?
I have tested it successfully on i.MX35 (with a few additions to platform code).
But i.MX35 has a single bit controlling both PWM IPG and PER clock gates.
On i.MX53, there are 2 separate control bits for these. So, if ipg clk is
strictly required to access PWM registers, even if per clk is enabled, this code
should not work without adding
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
and
+ clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
around each call to set_enable().
>
> @@ -186,7 +196,7 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip
> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>
> imx->set_enable(chip, false);
>
> - clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> imx->enabled = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -238,10 +248,19 @@ static int __devinit imx_pwm_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - imx->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pwm");
> + imx->clk_per = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "per");
> + if (IS_ERR(imx->clk_per)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "getting per clock failed with %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(imx->clk_per));
> + return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_per);
> + }
>
> - if (IS_ERR(imx->clk))
> - return PTR_ERR(imx->clk);
> + imx->clk_ipg = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ipg");
> + if (IS_ERR(imx->clk_ipg)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "getting ipg clock failed with %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg));
> + return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
> + }
>
> imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
Best regards,
Benoît
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 12:48 [PATCH v3] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm i.MX: factor out SoC specific functions Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 13:04 ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm i.MX: remove unnecessary if in pwm_[en|dis]able Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm i.MX: add functions to enable/disable pwm Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm i.MX: Use module_platform_driver Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm i.MX: use per clock unconditionally Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 18:31 ` Benoît Thébaudeau [this message]
2012-09-06 18:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 19:09 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-07 7:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 9:57 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwm support Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM i.MX: remove PWM platform support Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 13:10 ` [PATCH v3] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Thierry Reding
2012-09-07 17:14 ` Sascha Hauer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-28 11:48 i.MX pwm patches Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=996111492.3799131.1346956318651.JavaMail.root@advansee.com \
--to=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shachimi@adeneo-embedded.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome