From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect kvm->memslots with a mutex
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <997f9fe3-847b-8216-c629-1ad5fdd2ffae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427223635.2711774-6-bgardon@google.com>
On 28/04/21 00:36, Ben Gardon wrote:
> +void kvm_arch_assign_memslots(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id,
> + struct kvm_memslots *slots)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.memslot_assignment_lock);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(kvm->memslots[as_id], slots);
> + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.memslot_assignment_lock);
> +}
Does the assignment also needs the lock, or only the rmap allocation? I
would prefer the hook to be something like kvm_arch_setup_new_memslots.
(Also it is useful to have a comment somewhere explaining why the
slots_lock does not work. IIUC there would be a deadlock because you'd
be taking the slots_lock inside an SRCU critical region, while usually
the slots_lock critical section is the one that includes a
synchronize_srcu; I should dig that up and document that ordering in
Documentation/virt/kvm too).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 22:36 [PATCH 0/6] Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Track if shadow MMU active Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip rmap operations if shadow MMU inactive Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing in allocate_memslot_rmap Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 10:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-28 16:23 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect kvm->memslots with a mutex Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 6:25 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-04-28 16:40 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 17:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-28 20:40 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 21:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-28 21:46 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 23:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-29 0:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-29 1:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-29 7:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-29 17:45 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-04-28 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-28 16:45 ` Ben Gardon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=997f9fe3-847b-8216-c629-1ad5fdd2ffae@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®