From: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:09:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <998d0e4a0803121309s125dddbao801e53e44296a4d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:06 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> hi,
>
> More tests from FreeBSD people <http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/smp.html>
>
> Poor performance with 2.6.24 linux kernel and glibc 2.7 provided by Fedora 8:
>
> *Memory allocation performance on FreeBSD and Linux with ebizzy (Mar 2008)*
> <http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/ebizzy.html>
>
> -thanks-
>
> regards,
> --
> so much to do, so little time.
Assume a SMP system that has 8 CPUs. The main problem of requesting
pages is the BKL (Big Kernel Lock) in this SMP system used for mutual
exclusion of the shared resource (the memory).
To solve this major problem, i propose you freely to allocate 8 local caches
of (e.g.) 2 MiB each CPU (total 2MiB x 8 CPUs = 16 MiB) acting as
8 producer buffers for globally many consumer tasks (e.g. >= 20).
When the some producer buffer is empty then it does unfrequently BKL to
allocate another 2 MiB more from the shared resource (the memory).
In the reverse, it's simple, return back the unused pages to the local buffer
of the producer, and when this full then to do BKL too to unallocate its half
to the shared resource (the memory).
Sincerely, J.C.Pizarro
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 20:09 J.C. Pizarro [this message]
2008-03-12 21:12 ` Al Viro
2008-03-13 5:57 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-13 6:22 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-13 11:02 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 11:04 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:10 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-13 12:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 13:55 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-13 19:40 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 20:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 22:50 ` Al Viro
2008-03-14 12:11 ` Stephen Clark
2008-03-14 6:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-13 10:50 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:23 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-12 21:32 ` Al Viro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 18:14 Xose Vazquez Perez
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=998d0e4a0803121309s125dddbao801e53e44296a4d6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jcpiza@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®