From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Audit: Records for multiple security contexts
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 10:27:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99ee372d-ca63-4dae-bf53-567a5dc69be4@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250816164140.6045-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Opps. script error. Please disregard.
On 8/16/2025 9:41 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> The Linux audit system includes LSM based security "context" information
> in its events. Historically, only one LSM that uses security contexts can
> be active on a system. One of the few obsticles to allowing multiple LSM
> support is the inability to report more than one security context in an
> audit event. This patchset provides a mechanism to provide supplimental
> records containing more than one security context for subjects and
> objects.
>
> The mechanism for reporting multiple security contexts inspired
> considerable discussion. It would have been possible to add multiple
> contexts to existing records using sophisticated formatting. This would
> have significant backward compatibility issues, and require additional
> parsing in user space code. Adding new records for an event that contain
> the contexts is more in keeping with the way audit events have been
> constructed in the past.
>
> Only audit events associated with system calls have required multiple
> records prior to this. Mechanism has been added allowing any event
> to be composed of multiple records. This should make it easier to
> add information to existing audit events without breaking backward
> compatability.
>
> v5:
> Comment on the LSM_ID_UNDEF behavior in security_secid_to_secctx().
> Change some names to better reflect their purpose.
> Move alignment changes into a separate patch.
> v4:
> Use LSM_ID_UNDEF when checking for valid LSM IDs in
> security_lsmprop_to_secctx().
> Fix the object record to include only those for LSMs that use them.
> Squash the two patches dealing with subject contexts.
> Base the patches on Paul Moore's LSM initialization patchset.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250409185019.238841-31-paul@paul-moore.com/
> v3:
> Rework how security modules identify that they provide security
> contexts to the audit system. Maintain a list within the audit
> system of the security modules that provide security contexts.
> Revert the separate counts of subject and object contexts.
> v2:
> Maintain separate counts for LSMs using subject contexts and object
> contexts. AppArmor uses the former but not the latter.
> Correct error handling in object record creation.
>
> https://github.com/cschaufler/lsm-stacking#audit-6.16-rc4-v5
>
> Casey Schaufler (5):
> Audit: Create audit_stamp structure
> LSM: security_lsmblob_to_secctx module selection
> Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
> Audit: Fix indentation in audit_log_exit
> Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts
>
> include/linux/audit.h | 23 +++
> include/linux/security.h | 6 +-
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 +
> kernel/audit.c | 274 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> kernel/audit.h | 13 +-
> kernel/auditsc.c | 65 +++------
> net/netlabel/netlabel_user.c | 8 +-
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 3 +
> security/lsm.h | 4 -
> security/lsm_init.c | 5 -
> security/security.c | 21 ++-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 5 +
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 5 +
> 13 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-16 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250816164140.6045-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2025-08-16 16:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] LSM: security_lsmblob_to_secctx module selection Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] Audit: Fix indentation in audit_log_exit Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2025-08-16 17:27 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
[not found] <20250716212731.31628-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2025-07-16 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Audit: Records for multiple security contexts Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99ee372d-ca63-4dae-bf53-567a5dc69be4@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®