From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Lebrun <dav.lebrun@gmail.com>,
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: sr: fix useless rol32 call on hash
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:08:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99f5bcb9b5a3604264d43e7305950dcf7f6cfcc7.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ab9af97-33b6-d5cc-d1e9-6e5fbd9158a8@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 17:03 +0100, David Lebrun wrote:
> On 07/17/2018 04:52 PM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King<colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > The rol32 call is currently rotating hash but the rol'd value is
> > being discarded. I believe the current code is incorrect and hash
> > should be assigned the rotated value returned from rol32.
> >
> > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468411 ("Useless call")
> >
> > Fixes: b5facfdba14c ("ipv6: sr: Compute flowlabel for outer IPv6 header of seg6 encap mode")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King<colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Acked-by: dlebrun@google.com
>
> Good catch, thanks !
>
> In that case, the same issue is present in
> include/net/ipv6.h:ip6_make_flowlabel().
Perhaps all of the ror and rol definitions should add
__must_check
Something like the below and perhaps many more of the
functions that return some value should have __must_chedk
added as well.
---
include/linux/bitops.h | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index af419012d77d..3cddde65c8bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static inline __u64 rol64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u64 ror64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u64 ror64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word >> shift) | (word << (64 - shift));
}
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static inline __u64 ror64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word << shift) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31));
}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift));
}
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u16 rol16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u16 rol16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word << shift) | (word >> (16 - shift));
}
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline __u16 rol16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u16 ror16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u16 ror16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word >> shift) | (word << (16 - shift));
}
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline __u16 ror16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u8 rol8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u8 rol8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word << shift) | (word >> (8 - shift));
}
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static inline __u8 rol8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
-static inline __u8 ror8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
+static inline __must_check __u8 ror8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word >> shift) | (word << (8 - shift));
}
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline __u8 ror8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
*
* This is safe to use for 16- and 8-bit types as well.
*/
-static inline __s32 sign_extend32(__u32 value, int index)
+static inline __must_check __s32 sign_extend32(__u32 value, int index)
{
__u8 shift = 31 - index;
return (__s32)(value << shift) >> shift;
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static inline __s32 sign_extend32(__u32 value, int index)
* @value: value to sign extend
* @index: 0 based bit index (0<=index<64) to sign bit
*/
-static inline __s64 sign_extend64(__u64 value, int index)
+static inline __must_check __s64 sign_extend64(__u64 value, int index)
{
__u8 shift = 63 - index;
return (__s64)(value << shift) >> shift;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 15:52 Colin King
2018-07-17 16:03 ` David Lebrun
2018-07-17 17:08 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-07-18 22:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99f5bcb9b5a3604264d43e7305950dcf7f6cfcc7.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dav.lebrun@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®