mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] memcg: multi objcg charge support
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 14:33:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9D6F8C2F-F3E7-4326-A4F6-D5B1433A6C55@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522011908.1669332-5-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>



> On May 22, 2026, at 09:19, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> Commit 01b9da291c49 ("mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg
> per-node type") split a memcg's single obj_cgroup into one per NUMA
> node so that reparenting LRU folios can take per-node lru locks. As a
> side effect, the per-CPU obj_stock_pcp -- which caches exactly one
> cached_objcg -- thrashes on workloads where threads of the same memcg
> run on different NUMA nodes. The kernel test robot reported a 67.7%
> regression on stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec from this pattern.
> 
> Mirror the multi-slot pattern already used by memcg_stock_pcp: turn
> nr_bytes and cached_objcg into NR_OBJ_STOCK-element arrays, scan all
> slots on consume/refill/account, prefer empty slots when inserting,
> and evict a random slot only when full. With multiple slots a CPU can
> hold the per-node objcg variants of one memcg plus a few siblings
> without ever forcing a drain.
> 
> A single int8_t index records which slot the cached slab stats belong
> to; the stats are flushed on slot or pgdat change. With NR_OBJ_STOCK
> = 5 the layout (verified with pahole) is:
> 
>  offset 0  : lock(1) + index(1) + node_id(2) + slab stats(4) = 8B
>  offset 8  : nr_bytes[5]                                     = 10B
>  offset 18 : padding                                         = 6B
>  offset 24 : cached[5]                                       = 40B
>  offset 64 : (line 2) work_struct + flags (cold)
> 
> so consume_obj_stock, refill_obj_stock and the slab account path each
> touch exactly one 64-byte cache line on non-debug 64-bit builds.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202605121641.b6a60cb0-lkp@intel.com
> Fixes: 01b9da291c49 ("mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg per-node type")
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Use round robin for drain
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 78c02451312b..ba17633b0bd0 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ static void obj_cgroup_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> 	* However, it can be PAGE_SIZE or (x * PAGE_SIZE).
> 	*
> 	* The following sequence can lead to it:
> - 	* 1) CPU0: objcg == stock->cached_objcg
> + 	* 1) CPU0: objcg cached in one of stock->cached[i]
> 	* 2) CPU1: we do a small allocation (e.g. 92 bytes),
> 	*          PAGE_SIZE bytes are charged
> 	* 3) CPU1: a process from another memcg is allocating something,
> 	*          the stock if flushed,
> 	*          objcg->nr_charged_bytes = PAGE_SIZE - 92
> 	* 5) CPU0: we do release this object,
           ^
           4

Since you're already modifying the comments in this section,
would you mind fixing the numbering as well? I noticed that the
sequence was wrong a while back :)

> - 	*          92 bytes are added to stock->nr_bytes
> + 	*          92 bytes are added to stock->nr_bytes[i]
> 	* 6) CPU0: stock is flushed,
           ^
           5

Thanks,
Muchun

> 	*          92 bytes are added to objcg->nr_charged_bytes




  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22  1:19 [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: shrink obj_stock_pcp and cache multiple objcgs Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  1:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] memcg: store node_id instead of pglist_data pointer Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  2:27   ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-22  1:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memcg: uint16_t for nr_bytes in obj_stock_pcp Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  2:23   ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-22 16:30     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  6:27   ` Muchun Song
2026-05-22  1:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] memcg: int16_t for cached slab stats Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  2:30   ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-22  6:27   ` Muchun Song
2026-05-22  7:50   ` David Laight
2026-05-22  1:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] memcg: multi objcg charge support Shakeel Butt
2026-05-22  6:33   ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-05-22 16:37     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-23  2:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: shrink obj_stock_pcp and cache multiple objcgs Andrew Morton
2026-05-25 18:53   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9D6F8C2F-F3E7-4326-A4F6-D5B1433A6C55@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome