From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.140 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794476309; b=mhJoI7oojXGzEP+a+EFw4rOHW5iwydAa5FacSvtIiM1hzH8zco9h4A4lXV8mgeo7cNch MwDR6fYQf8A6MDe5/9bmneBNIXHR1AcAYgi8qnDIQBKY0i9TUmOCovbnPva4xOU8vhRcw ELhnBzSwllT0mONW1wnerZ71WpitwDnjMTQBXyuGaM2XYBjvO1SOqV5sH6VE2PuHCXNKE 76Usy5Dzj7fX3Pkh1Hd0AVHFLv899bavVTDKVVIDLpCApSlXzfMobEWE02RlxlhqqRDf/ ueAjBCDV7sQZ6gK9MzOHJ4Es8zW3rpOVbEo8c2yPhKerVzD/qXZEk1fYtxXeUtWow/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794476309; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=U2TDbKAnFz/PUpn8r3Gfv9DpcDc8O6+4aawWDP9AXUE=; b=YfMdUbi58vykIMFxRlGhl8aUKdX5RJpp60UA0QARJxF38jPr6KWcKaV7GeJiVFTdHhbp vbQTK6Cb5pU8NdM7ICID57NbTLqVzdLxnfYqLNrjPT/n4LN9ZKpOKUNhgz0PovtACJ5mF 4KyIUcpJsHOsFaMHZNUsMPdveN0kqzCNtA4ChZAk5TJqPdAbpKg97UIjeNjD56W3UxAdn avNXiofWw+bcDmoSXe3glqaD2fQEuWDRcW77lyrK/1W4MEENhktqlRuf0CmZ36q3jMLEI vJYA1O7Ya8BsPvbuvyPCf/o1vq6fmzPxzY/bOXAfcygMsAFtQOOYt+szH4jsDblOBwQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=PgSIoqhe; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.140 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-140.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1983606A321 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org E1983606A321 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=PgSIoqhe X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=Bt1xUj/VmyXvca7gxum1cF/z09pb5LjCLbZsA6IbGVw=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1794476307; v=1; x=1795081107; b=PgSIoqhe2Ly6GkaoGdIa4ifVpEXj1dtW4gsnWYN99EyBn9m/dpugt7RZTIYumJGH1RGYP8Aw D075tWfV1o/7IVJJeF8gOsKqAhUP05zBsNnHWszm9+4eKvT5myY9kAWStWwID7bIw6PvOUSfgnx 26u9WN1KU0muJ7Gak5oklx5g= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 01d0cf1fa9ea3b88; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:38:26 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 01d0cf1fa9ea3b88 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 10:38:21 +0100 From: Luka Gejak To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Noah Weinberger , "pkshih@realtek.com" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "security@kernel.org" Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH=5D_wifi=3A_rtw88=3A_sdio=3A_check_p?= =?US-ASCII?Q?acket_length_against_remaining_RX_data?= In-Reply-To: <912f7250-d1bb-43cd-8efc-9ad7b0c4f1a9@kernel.org> References: <43A4B4D6-EB5F-4079-8BE9-A452DA8B2AB6@linux.dev> <912f7250-d1bb-43cd-8efc-9ad7b0c4f1a9@kernel.org> Message-ID: <9EEA5565-0A03-41F8-91ED-C50D4A632AE3@linux.dev> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On November 12, 2026 10:24:53 AM GMT+01:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >On 10/11/2026 02:34, Luka Gejak wrote: >> Hi Noah, >> >> Thanks for looking into this. A few comments below. >> >> On November 8, 2026 11:27:09 PM GMT+01:00, Noah Weinberger >> wrote: >> >>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: sdio: check packet length against >remaining RX data >> >> This doesn't apply to rtw-next, which is the tree rtw88 patches should >be > >This was a report, not a patch whihc can be applied. It's visible by >lack of DCO. > > > >Best regards, >Krzysztof > As Noah wrote in private email, emphasis on submission and version of the patch: >Hi Luka, >Thanks for the detailed review >and for pointing me to the >existing fix >in >rtw-next. I’ll drop this >version of the patch. >I appreciate the corrections >and the guidance on the target >tree, >testing >and submission format. I’ll >keep those in mind for future >patches. >Thanks, >Noah Best regards, Luka Gejak